From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port()
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 01:06:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531E61AC.6040706@hurleysoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1393593694-30262-1-git-send-email-geert@linux-m68k.org>
[ +cc Alan ]
On 02/28/2014 08:21 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
>
> If the serial port being removed is used as a console, it must also be
> unregistered from the console subsystem using unregister_console().
>
> uart_ops.release_port() will release resources (e.g. iounmap() the serial
> port registers), causing a crash on subsequent kernel output if the console
> is still registered.
This brings up an interesting point: where are the serial_core drivers
indicating to the tty core that the port is bound to a console?
IOW, I cannot find a single 'port->console = 1' anywhere in the serial tree.
It would be bad if the uart port disappears while a console is running
on it...
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> index ece2049bd270..8ece7f14d89d 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
> @@ -2677,6 +2677,12 @@ int uart_remove_one_port(struct uart_driver *drv, struct uart_port *uport)
> tty_vhangup(port->tty);
>
> /*
> + * If the port is used as a console, unregister it
> + */
> + if (uart_console(uport))
> + unregister_console(uport->cons);
> +
> + /*
> * Free the port IO and memory resources, if any.
> */
> if (uport->type != PORT_UNKNOWN)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-28 13:21 [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port() Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-02-28 13:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] serial: sh-sci: Add missing call to uart_remove_one_port() in failure path Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-06 4:19 ` Simon Horman
2014-03-06 4:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-03-11 1:06 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2014-03-11 3:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] serial_core: Unregister console in uart_remove_one_port() Peter Hurley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531E61AC.6040706@hurleysoftware.com \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).