From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Cc: Simon <horms@verge.net.au>, Magnus <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linux-SH <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: block: add block number limitation flag for lultiple block read
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 13:25:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538886E6.4000209@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87oayfpn14.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
On 05/30/2014 02:40 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> In some controllers, when performing a multiple block read of
You've typoed in the subject: "lultiple".
> one or two blocks, depending on the timing with which the
> response register is read, the response value may not
> be read properly.
> Use single block read for this HW bug
> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/mmc/host.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index 452782b..f3cbe37 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -1400,8 +1400,23 @@ static void mmc_blk_rw_rq_prep(struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq,
>
> /* Some controllers can't do multiblock reads due to hw bugs */
> if (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_NO_MULTI_READ &&
> - rq_data_dir(req) = READ)
> - brq->data.blocks = 1;
> + rq_data_dir(req) = READ) {
> +
> + if (card->host->caps2 & MMC_CAP2_2BLKS_LIMIT) {
> + /*
> + * In some controllers, when performing a
> + * multiple block read of one or two blocks,
> + * depending on the timing with which the
> + * response register is read, the response
> + * value may not be read properly.
> + * Use single block read for this HW bug
> + */
> + if (brq->data.blocks = 2)
> + brq->data.blocks = 1;
I don't understand: previous code set 'brq->data.blocks' to 1 in any case
without your extra flag. Why there's a need to set it specifically for 2
blocks (and not set for a larger # of blocks)? This looks like an optimization
of some sort, not a workaround?..
> + } else {
> + brq->data.blocks = 1;
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> if (brq->data.blocks > 1 || do_rel_wr) {
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 10:40 [PATCH 0/3] mmc: Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 10:40 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: block: add block number limitation flag for lultiple block read Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 11:00 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-05-30 11:14 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 11:46 ` Ben Dooks
2014-05-30 13:25 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-05-30 13:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhi: tidyup mmc_data setting for R-Car SDHI Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 10:40 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: tmio: care about DMA tx/rx addr offset Kuninori Morimoto
2014-05-30 10:56 ` Ben Dooks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538886E6.4000209@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).