From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:04:34 +0000 Subject: Re: Ethernet bug at Upstream-v3.15-rcx on Lager. Message-Id: <53888FF2.8040505@codethink.co.uk> List-Id: References: <53745E88.7040108@jinso.co.jp> <5374F753.70203@cogentembedded.com> <537564FC.4090905@jinso.co.jp> <5375A877.1090606@renesas.com> In-Reply-To: <5375A877.1090606@renesas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: Yoshihiro Shimoda , cm-hiep@jinso.co.jp Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Simon Horman On 16/05/14 06:56, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Hi Hiep-san, > > (2014/05/16 10:08), カオ　ミン　ヒェップ wrote: >>> >>>> Please review it when you have time. >>> >>> Please try this patch: >>> >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m9602519809181 >>> >> I have tested this patch on v3.15.0-rc5-00077-g14186fe, and results are the message of >> "sh-eth r8a7790-ether eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow" has disappeared and sending datagrams is good. >> (Bandwidth 10M to 100M: Test with 5/5 times by script and by hand are good) >> > > It's nice! > So, I hope the patch is merged in upstream. > However, the patch's change log mentioned r8a7790 only. > The r8a7791's ethernet controller also has this bit. The bit update covers both of them as the r8a7790 and r8a7791 both share the same configuration structure. I re-sent the patch but didn't find your email post until after I had sent it, otherwise I would have mentioned your testing specifically. In future it would be helpful if you could do the following - Mention driver by name in the subject line - Search the list for previous mentions and reply to that/those threads. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius