From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 16:30:26 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: lager: add i2c1, i2c2 pins Message-Id: <53909B22.9010701@codethink.co.uk> List-Id: References: <1392224674-5328-2-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1392224674-5328-2-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On 05/06/14 14:39, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/05/2014 04:32 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > >>> Add pinctrl definitions for i2c1 and i2c2 busses on the Lager board >>> to ensure these are setup correctly at initialisation time. The i2c0 >>> and i2c3 busses are connected to single function pins. > >>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >>> --- >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > >> I have queued up the following. > >> There was some fuzz when applying this patch, please check that the >> following is correct. > >> From: Ben Dooks > >> [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: lager: add i2c1, i2c2 pins > >> Add pinctrl definitions for i2c1 and i2c2 busses on the Lager board >> to ensure these are setup correctly at initialisation time. The i2c0 >> and i2c3 busses are connected to single function pins. > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >> [horms+renesas@verge.net.au: Added shmobile to patch title] >> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> index ee80788..e33ed0d 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790-lager.dts >> @@ -139,6 +139,16 @@ >> states = <3300000 1 >> 1800000 0>; >> }; >> + >> + i2c1_pins: i2c1 { >> + renesas,groups = "i2c1"; >> + renesas,function = "i2c1"; >> + }; >> + >> + i2c2_pins: i2c2 { >> + renesas,groups = "i2c2"; >> + renesas,function = "i2c2"; >> + }; > > These subnodes ended up added to a wrong node, they should have been > added to the PFC node below. Thanks, it is not obvious from just looking at them. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius