From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/xen: support poweroff through poweroff handler call chain
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2014 09:45:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542D1EC4.10100@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412100056-15517-15-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net>
On 30/09/14 19:00, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The kernel core now supports a poweroff handler call chain
> to remove power from the system. Call it if pm_power_off
> is set to NULL.
>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index c0cb11f..645d00f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1322,6 +1322,8 @@ static void xen_machine_power_off(void)
> {
> if (pm_power_off)
> pm_power_off();
> + else
> + do_kernel_poweroff();
Why isn't this if (pm_power_off) check in do_kernel_poweroff()?
That way when you finally remove pm_power_off you need only update one
place. A quick skim of the other archs suggest this would work for them
too.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 18:00 [RFC PATCH 00/16] kernel: Add support for poweroff handler call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16] " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16] hwmon: (ab8500) Call kernel_power_off instead of pm_power_off Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16] parisc: support poweroff through poweroff handler call chain Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16] arm: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16] arm64: " Guenter Roeck
2014-10-03 10:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-10-03 13:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16] avr32: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16] c6x: " Guenter Roeck
2014-10-03 15:17 ` Mark Salter
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16] ia64: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16] metag: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16] mips: " Guenter Roeck
2014-10-01 13:32 ` Ralf Baechle
2014-10-01 16:26 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16] sh: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16] unicore32: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16] x86: " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16] x86/xen: " Guenter Roeck
2014-10-02 9:45 ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-10-02 13:27 ` [Xen-devel] " Guenter Roeck
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16] power/reset: restart-poweroff: Register with kernel poweroff handler Guenter Roeck
2014-10-03 14:27 ` Sebastian Reichel
2014-09-30 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH 16/16] mfd: palmas: " Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542D1EC4.10100@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).