From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre-Louis Bossart Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:27:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] Question on Compressed offload session Message-Id: <5464CDE2.2070406@linux.intel.com> List-Id: References: <85499f52ebd29581bf58b9cafbae6864.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <85499f52ebd29581bf58b9cafbae6864.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: gsantosh@codeaurora.org, alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Cc: Mark Rutland , Rob Herring , ALSA Development Mailing List , Kuninori Morimoto , Linux-sh list , Stephen Warren , Magnus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , Geert Uytterhoeven , grant.likely@linaro.org, Kuninori Morimoto On 11/12/14, 9:02 PM, gsantosh@codeaurora.org wrote: > Hi All, > > The Question is for the compressed offload session. > > For a generic codec driver during the startup function it will set some of > the hw_constraints rule similarly like this. > > snd_pcm_hw_constraint_list(substream->runtime, 0, > SNDRV_PCM_HW_PARAM_RATE, > &constraints_12_24); > > pcm_lib.c will try to add the rule to the runtime structure by accessing > the pointers which will be initialized during opening of the session, > as The Constraints added by the codec driver will be updated in the > > struct snd_pcm_hw_constraints of runtime structure which will be part of > substream handle. > > But for the compressed offload I do not see the initialization done for HW > constraints, as done in pcm session > > 2092int snd_pcm_open_substream(struct snd_pcm *pcm, int stream, > 2093 struct file *file, > 2094 struct snd_pcm_substream **rsubstream) > > most of the existing drivers which has the hw_constraint_list code will > not be applicable for compress offload session, how to solve this? You can't directly link physical output/input with the decoder/encoder in general. For decoders, the sample-rate may not always be known ahead of time, e.g. with AAC-SBR implicit signaling. There is no way to add constraints on open, there is an assumption that a sample-rate converter is part of the chain to take care of the difference between the output of the offloaded decoder and the back-end actual sampling frequency (same with number of channels and bit-width btw). Likewise if you encode the frequency may not be the same as what the backend provides and some SRC might be needed. -Pierre