Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/6] Add CPUIdle support for Renesas SoCs

[keita kobayashi <keita.kobayashi.ym@renesas.com>]

Hi Daniel, Lina

Sorry for late reply.

(2015/03/10 0:32), Daniel Lezcano wrote:

> On 03/09/2015 04:21 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06 2015 at 02:38 -0700, keita kobayashi wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
>>>>
>>>> Hi Keita,
>>>>
>>>> the platform approach to pass private data from the arch specific to
>>>> the cpuidle driver no longer accepted. Unfortunately, there is no
>>>> alternate solution upstream.
>>>>
>>>> But hopefully, there is a patchset [1] submitted for upstreaming
>>>> which unify arm32/64 into a single generic cpuidle driver and use the
>>>> DT to define the idle functions to be used.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest you have a look at this patchset if it can fit your need.
>>>>
>>>>   -- Daniel
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/3/271
>>>
>>> Thank you for information.
>>> I will take a look at the patch series.
>>
>> Hi Kieta,
>>
>> Please also have a look at the v15 of the cpuidle support for QCOM SoC.
>> Sent just now.  It is based on [1].
> > Lina's patchset is available at:
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/devicetree@vger.kernel.org/msg64700.html
> 
> Thanks
>   -- Daniel
> 

Thank you for information.
I will confirm it.

Regards.
Keita Kobayashi