From: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:21:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <556C3234.2030805@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
On 5/19/2015 5:12 PM, Russell King wrote:
> All ARMv5 and older CPUs invalidate their caches in the early assembly
> setup function, prior to enabling the MMU. This is because the L1
> cache should not contain any data relevant to the execution of the
> kernel at this point; all data should have been flushed out to memory.
>
> This requirement should also be true for ARMv6 and ARMv7 CPUs - indeed,
> these typically do not search their caches when caching is disabled (as
> it needs to be when the MMU is disabled) so this change should be safe.
>
> ARMv7 allows there to be CPUs which search their caches while caching is
> disabled, and it's permitted that the cache is uninitialised at boot;
> for these, the architecture reference manual requires that an
> implementation specific code sequence is used immediately after reset
> to ensure that the cache is placed into a sane state. Such
> functionality is definitely outside the remit of the Linux kernel, and
> must be done by the SoC's firmware before _any_ CPU gets to the Linux
> kernel.
>
> Changing the data cache clean+invalidate to a mere invalidate allows us
> to get rid of a lot of platform specific hacks around this issue for
> their secondary CPU bringup paths - some of which were buggy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> ---
Hi Russell,
[...]
> arch/arm/mach-hisi/Makefile | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-hisi/core.h | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-hisi/headsmp.S | 16 ----------------
> arch/arm/mach-hisi/platsmp.c | 4 ++--
[...]
Sorry for the late reply.
For Hisilicon:
- hip01/ca9x2
- hix5hd2/dkb
Tested-by: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Wei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-01 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <E1Yuk8W-0001tC-IK@rmk-PC.arm.linux.org.uk>
2015-05-19 21:44 ` [PATCH] ARM: v7 setup function should invalidate L1 cache Heiko Stuebner
2015-05-19 21:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-19 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-19 22:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-05-20 18:54 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-05-20 22:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-05-21 2:08 ` Shawn Guo
2015-05-21 8:30 ` Thierry Reding
2015-05-22 7:36 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-01 10:53 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-01 11:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-17 20:35 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 21:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-17 22:12 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:31 ` Dinh Nguyen
2015-06-17 22:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-22 10:45 ` Michal Simek
2015-06-01 10:21 ` Wei Xu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=556C3234.2030805@hisilicon.com \
--to=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).