linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [musl] SH sigcontext ABI is broken
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 08:23:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <558A6905.7010406@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150619070912.GA15025@brightrain.aerifal.cx>

On 06/24/2015 09:10 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
> 
>> Nominally SH3 support remains in both the kernel and glibc. If it can
>> be established that multiple parties agree that there's really no one
>> left who cares about the old no-FPU sigcontext ABI on SH3, I will be
>> all for dropping it and unifying sigcontext.
> 
> Note that right now we have BE and LE versions of *three* ABIs for SH in 
> glibc (SH3 soft-float, SH4 soft-float, SH4 hard-float) (and as noted in 
> this discussion, right now each would only work properly on a kernel with 
> the corresponding configuration).  See 
> <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/ABIList>.
> 
> We can, of course, choose to declare processor or ABI variants no longer 
> supported in glibc, much like we desupported i386 in glibc (requiring i486 
> or later - albeit the official desupporting happening several years after 
> i386 would no longer build) or removed support for non-EABI ARM.  But 
> since we don't have an SH maintainer at all in glibc at present, it's 
> harder to make such a decision (whereas if an architecture maintainer 
> decided some variants were no longer relevant, they could just remove 
> support - make those variants give a configure-time error - in the absence 
> of someone objecting and willing to take over maintaining support for 
> those variants).
> 
> I think the next glibc change likely to require action from each 
> architecture's maintainer to avoid breaking the build may be Adhemerval's 
> cancellation changes - so if no-one comes forward as SH maintainer to at 
> least update SH for those changes when they are ready to go in, the build 
> for SH will be broken and that will indicate, as per 
> <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-06/msg00424.html>, that it may 
> be time to remove the port from glibc.

Eh, ping me when that happens. I may at least do necessary changes to
keep it building. (Although I can only test glibc on qemu-system-sh4.)

Rob


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-06-24  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-19  7:09 SH sigcontext ABI is broken Rich Felker
2015-06-19  7:41 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-06-19 19:12 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2015-06-19 19:57 ` Andreas Schwab
2015-06-19 20:32 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-20  8:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-06-20 18:06 ` [musl] " Rich Felker
2015-06-20 19:59 ` [musl] " Rob Landley
2015-06-24  4:25 ` [musl] " Rob Landley
2015-06-24  4:52 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-24  7:12 ` Rob Landley
2015-06-24  8:23 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2015-06-24  8:40 ` Rob Landley
2015-06-24  9:14 ` Rob Landley
2015-06-24 14:10 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-24 18:03 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-24 18:12 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-24 19:37 ` Joseph Myers
2015-06-24 20:08 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-24 21:34 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-24 22:02 ` Rich Felker
2015-06-25  6:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-07-02 19:23 ` [musl] " Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-07-02 22:51 ` Rob Landley
2015-07-03  6:43 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=558A6905.7010406@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).