From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:21:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55A971C1.8090308@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5578C427.1070100@codeaurora.org>
On 06/10/2015 04:11 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 06/10/2015 03:57 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
>> index 476092b86c6e..f2c4bf437ea7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/common.h
>> @@ -13,7 +13,8 @@ extern void shmobile_smp_boot(void);
>> extern void shmobile_smp_sleep(void);
>> extern void shmobile_smp_hook(unsigned int cpu, unsigned long fn,
>> unsigned long arg);
>> -extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu);
>> +extern bool shmobile_smp_cpu_can_disable(unsigned int cpu);
>> +extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void);
>>
>> which your original patch did not include. The tree I'm applying to
>> (-rc1) contains:
>>
>> extern int shmobile_smp_cpu_disable(unsigned int cpu);
>> extern void shmobile_invalidate_start(void);
>>
>> there. Hence git quite rightfully declines to apply the patch.
>>
> Thanks. Fixed.
>
Sorry I just noticed that you applied 8392/1 instead of 8392/2 from the
patch tracker. So shmobile_invalidate_start() came back.
I thought it would automatically supersede the previous patch but it
looks like it just sticks around? I've never had to replace a patch
before so I'll keep this in mind next time.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-17 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-10 22:33 [PATCH v5] ARM: smp: Only expose /sys/.../cpuX/online if hotpluggable Stephen Boyd
2015-04-11 17:23 ` Tyler Baker
2015-04-13 13:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-09 19:08 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-06-09 21:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 9:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-10 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-06-10 23:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-07-17 21:21 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2015-07-25 15:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55A971C1.8090308@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).