From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dirk Behme Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 17:21:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add L2 cache-controller nodes Message-Id: <56B2370D.2010102@gmail.com> List-Id: References: <1452953856-5146-1-git-send-email-dirk.behme@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1452953856-5146-1-git-send-email-dirk.behme@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 16.01.2016 15:17, Dirk Behme wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > > Add device nodes for the L2 caches, and link the CPU node to its L2 > cache node. > > The L2 cache for the Cortex-A57 CPU cores is 2 MiB large (organized as > 128 KiB x 16 ways). > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme > --- > Changes in v2: Dropped the not yet merged Cortex A53 part. > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > index a82bce8..a22ae65 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a7795.dtsi > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ > compatible = "arm,cortex-a57", "arm,armv8"; > reg = <0x0>; > device_type = "cpu"; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_CA57>; > enable-method = "psci"; > }; > > @@ -46,22 +47,29 @@ > compatible = "arm,cortex-a57","arm,armv8"; > reg = <0x1>; > device_type = "cpu"; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_CA57>; > enable-method = "psci"; > }; > a57_2: cpu@2 { > compatible = "arm,cortex-a57","arm,armv8"; > reg = <0x2>; > device_type = "cpu"; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_CA57>; > enable-method = "psci"; > }; > a57_3: cpu@3 { > compatible = "arm,cortex-a57","arm,armv8"; > reg = <0x3>; > device_type = "cpu"; > + next-level-cache = <&L2_CA57>; > enable-method = "psci"; > }; > }; > > + L2_CA57: cache-controller@0 { > + compatible = "cache"; > + }; > + > extal_clk: extal { > compatible = "fixed-clock"; > #clock-cells = <0>; > Any further comments to this? If not, could this be applied? Best regards Dirk