linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Availability of SH hardware?
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 01:54:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56F49A45.2040408@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160317032441.GA22517@brightrain.aerifal.cx>



On 03/23/2016 05:05 AM, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Rich,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org> wrote:
>> One of my goals in taking on maintainership of arch/sh is to gradually
>> replace all of the hard-coded legacy board/subtype support with device
>> tree based board descriptions, and clean up the related board support
>> infrastructure in arch/sh to be more in line with how things are done
>> on other archs these days. However the ability to make and test these
>> changes depends on having some actual hardware to work with.
>>
>> I'm working on the J-Core (currently J2) open hardware revival of the
>> SH architecture and don't have any original SH hardware (except
>> perhaps embedded in old appliances). Does anyone have pointers (direct
>> add-to-cart'able links) to where SH dev boards are still available, or
>> even better, any old hardware lying around that's not being used that
>> you'd be willing to donate?
>>
>> I'm especially interested in getting an SH-X3 board since it seems to
>> be the only model with existing SMP support, and moving it over to
>> device tree would eliminate the need for keeping around the
>> non-device-tree SMP register_smp_ops and cross-core cache invalidation
>> infrastructure, which are low-hanging fruit for refactoring/cleanup.
>> But really anything would be great to have.
> 
> I have a couple of old SH boards that I can hook up to remote access
> for you if that would help. Probably sh775x-based ones and maybe also
> something with sh2a. Need to go through my old boxes in the attic to
> find more detail. =)
> 
> As for SH-X3, I recall seeing that board IRL at some point on the desk
> next to me, but it was pretty rare even at that time so I highly doubt
> you will have any luck finding it or any SMP capable SH SoC.
> 
> In the mean time, does the sh4 target in QEMU work in system emulator
> mode? I recall user space emulation could run busybox at least.

Sure, I have prebuilt system images for that even.

  http://landley.net/aboriginal/bin/system-image-sh4.tar.gz

Most recently tested with the 4.3 kernel, I think?

Rob

Rob

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-25  1:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-17  3:24 Availability of SH hardware? Rich Felker
2016-03-17  9:10 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-17 17:21 ` Rich Felker
2016-03-23  7:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-23  9:52 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-23 10:01 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-23 10:05 ` Magnus Damm
2016-03-23 10:11 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-23 16:09 ` Rich Felker
2016-03-23 16:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-03-24  8:50 ` Magnus Damm
2016-03-24  9:01 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-24 11:40 ` Yoshinori Sato
2016-03-24 21:18 ` Magnus Damm
2016-03-24 22:00 ` Rich Felker
2016-03-24 23:52 ` Magnus Damm
2016-03-25  1:54 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2016-03-25  2:04 ` Rob Landley
2016-03-25 11:12 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-25 11:19 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-25 20:31 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-25 22:42 ` Rich Felker
2016-03-25 22:51 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-25 23:02 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-26  9:29 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-26  9:51 ` Yoshinori Sato
2016-03-26 21:18 ` Zoltan HERPAI
2016-03-26 21:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-28 14:17 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2016-03-29  4:17 ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56F49A45.2040408@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).