From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Laurent Dufour Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 08:41:23 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: remove odd HAVE_PTE_SPECIAL Message-Id: <5bd1bb46-8f71-e6db-7fb7-43d023a37f58@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Id: References: <1523433816-14460-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1523433816-14460-3-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20180411083315.GA23400@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20180411083315.GA23400@dhcp22.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On 11/04/2018 10:33, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 11-04-18 10:03:36, Laurent Dufour wrote: >> @@ -881,7 +876,8 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, >> >> if (is_zero_pfn(pfn)) >> return NULL; >> -check_pfn: >> + >> +check_pfn: __maybe_unused >> if (unlikely(pfn > highest_memmap_pfn)) { >> print_bad_pte(vma, addr, pte, NULL); >> return NULL; >> @@ -891,7 +887,7 @@ struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr, >> * NOTE! We still have PageReserved() pages in the page tables. >> * eg. VDSO mappings can cause them to exist. >> */ >> -out: >> +out: __maybe_unused >> return pfn_to_page(pfn); > > Why do we need this ugliness all of the sudden? Indeed the compiler doesn't complaint but in theory it should since these labels are not used depending on CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PTE_SPECIAL.