linux-sh.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 21:54:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7hwq1v4iq4.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150401124007.20c440cc43a482f698f461b8@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 1 Apr 2015 12:40:07 -0700")

Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:

> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t put_new_page,
>> > -			unsigned long private, struct page *page, int force,
>> > -			enum migrate_mode mode)
>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>> > +				   free_page_t put_new_page,
>> > +				   unsigned long private, struct page *page,
>> > +				   int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>> >  {
>> >  	int rc = 0;
>> >  	int *result = NULL;
>> > 
>> 
>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>> 
>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>> mechanism?
>
> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>
> How does this look?
>
> Kevin, could you please retest?  I might have fat-fingered something...

Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.  

/me goes to test a few more compilers...   OK...

ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3

The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.

Kevin


[1]
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index 25fd7f6291de..6e15ae3248e0 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -901,10 +901,10 @@ out:
 }
 
 /*
- * gcc-4.7.3 on arm gets an ICE when inlining unmap_and_move().  Work around
+ * gcc 4.7 and 4.8 on arm gets an ICE when inlining unmap_and_move().  Work around
  * it.
  */
-#if GCC_VERSION = 40703 && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
+#if (GCC_VERSION >= 40700 && GCC_VERSION < 40900) && defined(CONFIG_ARM)
 #define ICE_noinline noinline
 #else
 #define ICE_noinline

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-01 21:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-24  0:45 Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-24  0:52 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  0:53   ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24  8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:13   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-26  0:39     ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26 13:36       ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:29         ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27  0:25           ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 10:06             ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 11:55               ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 15:18               ` Tyler Baker
     [not found]               ` <7hbnj99epe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
2015-03-31 21:39                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 22:10                   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  9:37                     ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible re Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01  9:47                       ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01 19:40                         ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 21:54                           ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2015-04-01 21:59                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02  7:17                               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 19:12                             ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:12                               ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-02 21:53                                 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-07 17:57                             ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 20:17                               ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:41                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:53                                   ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:27                                     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:36                                       ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-08  0:15                                         ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27                       ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01  8:58                 ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Will Deacon
2015-04-01 13:54                   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 18:12                   ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7hwq1v4iq4.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
    --to=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).