From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yoshinori Sato Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 06:54:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code Message-Id: <87bn3kcc7o.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> List-Id: References: <1461348424-3896-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20160526164557.GJ27984@windriver.com> <20160526165334.GY21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20160526165334.GY21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rich Felker Cc: Paul Gortmaker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 27 May 2016 01:53:34 +0900, Rich Felker wrote: > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > [[PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 22/04/2016 (Fri 14:07) Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > > > > For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to > > > make kernel code consistent with the Makefiles/Kconfigs that control them. > > > > Ping -- wondering if there are any issues here, or if I can expect these > > to be merged upstream in the merge window. I didn't see them loop > > around via the linux-next tree but I wasn't sure if arch/sh has a repo > > for linux-next. > > I don't have experience with the affected code, but it looks ok unless > any of these "should" be modular and Kconfig was just wrong to > disallow it. > > Sato-san, do you have an opinion on these? Should I go ahead and just > merge them? It looks no problem. I think can merge it. > Rich > > > > This means not using modular functions/macros for code that can never > > > be built as a module. Some of the other downfalls this leads to are: > > > > > > (1) it is easy to accidentally write unused module_exit and remove code > > > (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be > > > modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it > > > (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn > > > includes nearly everything else, thus adding to CPP overhead. > > > (4) it gets copied/replicated into other drivers and spreads like weeds. > > > > > > Three of the four commits here are completely trivial with zero runtime > > > impact whatsoever. The fourth has a deletion of a ".remove" function > > > and as we've done elsewhere, we block the sysfs ability to reach in and > > > manually execute that function, since there isn't a sane use case for > > > which doing that makes sense. > > > > > > Build tested on today's linux-next ; full build fails on duplicate syms > > > from OF generic board, but that is a known and reported issue elsewhere; > > > it has nothing to do with the changes here. > > > > > > Paul > > > -- > > > > > > Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker > > > Cc: Rich Felker > > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato > > > > > > > > > Paul Gortmaker (4): > > > sh: make time.c explicitly non-modular > > > sh: make mm/asids-debugfs explicitly non-modular > > > sh: make board-secureedge5410 explicitly non-modular > > > sh: make heartbeat driver explicitly non-modular > > > > > > arch/sh/boards/board-secureedge5410.c | 3 +-- > > > arch/sh/drivers/heartbeat.c | 32 +++----------------------------- > > > arch/sh/kernel/time.c | 3 +-- > > > arch/sh/mm/asids-debugfs.c | 5 +---- > > > 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) > > > > > > -- > > > 2.8.0 > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Yoshinori Sato