From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1D6F335A7; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725864013; cv=none; b=LaC8UWA7Q7eAs8oS0iotLZbwVIK2XDtRfQ5dDSGp7PmD5r4tyZxiCdbxcgBT7cE8rVzKZBEo6Kf2TgKpcQC8PBtDtb87K/gYjZVWXV/BvSjIEjx+yPkwrakduyrje6cZt+dtF7iVM1GaNs7gt1v3pKSzbs+Oz4BhjbYilU2vPMo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725864013; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6PbbI4EATTD/OrTPSWHrhxuPyO3m+IU1wrsU9S79Rm0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BwVDbOflTFf4NKKGWCAWfM31aqM5fci8GWW8OZwIimO5WoYzCu7F28uEkR7SdKx728xF7Yc/+MW+b0tV3wGAcR+wQMTFYvzfBj/RSg8vi4Jhp3RWtJBXbOMtts3vxHpCDTjJxW5YS2IVt+iaCKqNwd5kMhbK0AneJqzbvODTh5A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ellerman.id.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b=V9dqjOT5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ellerman.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ellerman.id.au header.i=@ellerman.id.au header.b="V9dqjOT5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ellerman.id.au; s=201909; t=1725864005; bh=6PbbI4EATTD/OrTPSWHrhxuPyO3m+IU1wrsU9S79Rm0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=V9dqjOT5cG2Z/ik0KS2Ug814aSRbGFjOwq9SedHMMKCwpDrApwYz0ArGViy5Lb/a6 yyUPuQILPkjStOT8poYnkXv2Jooq74dG20gBuKXWTIdbtJfuzKXTK1LVngFS+qL47Y plgL18Xfd9FhnusGMn98V4drs3aZqenn6kZzlW+KAAn68oBd1MaE8NVVkazwUXht2r y2quNbgbn/OHE5rKZB9Fx2hIk0Mg2qRd4DwRBh0Sau3G8FCHg4cobRsRqgbBZ3xziP FB93Q+bcT6tCTUMRm6xjrcCEfb6yStHAyYy1QsneaiFUFc7x2lJo9kSs8Zj/PeDUv+ ly/dIYijM2sMA== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X2HJL6vpQz4w2F; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 16:40:02 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman To: Dave Vasilevsky , glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de, bhe@redhat.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Reimar =?utf-8?Q?D=C3=B6ffinger?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] crash: Default to CRASH_DUMP=n when support for it is unlikely In-Reply-To: References: <20240823125156.104775-1-dave@vasilevsky.ca> Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 16:40:02 +1000 Message-ID: <87ed5t49fh.fsf@mail.lhotse> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Dave Vasilevsky writes: > I received a notification from Patchwork that my patch is now in the > state "Handled Elsewhere".[0] Does that mean someone merged it > somewhere? Or that I should be using a different mailing list? Or > something else? > > I'd appreciate some guidance. It was sent/Cc'ed to linuxppc-dev, so it was picked up by the linuxppc patchwork, which is fine and normal. Because it touches many arches I don't plan to merge it, I would expect the kexec maintainers to take it. So I marked it as "Handled Elsewhere" in the linuxppc patchwork - ie. not handled via the powerpc tree. That doesn't mean anyone else has merged it, it just means I haven't and don't plan to. cheers