Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 09/12] of: FDT vaddr support for SH.

[Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>]

On Fri, 01 Sep 2023 22:11:01 +0900,
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> Hi Sato-san,
> 
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2023 at 5:18 AM Yoshinori Sato
> <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp> wrote:
> > sh using virt address in FDT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> 
> Thanks for your patch!
> 
> > --- a/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/of/fdt.c
> > @@ -643,6 +643,9 @@ void __init early_init_fdt_scan_reserved_mem(void)
> >                 fdt_get_mem_rsv(initial_boot_params, n, &base, &size);
> >                 if (!size)
> >                         break;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SUPERH
> > +               base = virt_to_phys(base);
> > +#endif
> 
> I guess this is a no-go.
> Why can't you use physical address, like all other platforms?

I changed this before so I don't remember the exact details,
but I feel like it was related to the built-in DTB.
I think the correct way is to handle it in the SH dependent part.

> >                 memblock_reserve(base, size);
> >         }
> >
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                         Geert
> 
> -- 
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
> 
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

-- 
Yosinori Sato