From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Ball Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 07:19:00 +0000 Subject: Re: Boot regression on Mackerel with current mainline Message-Id: <87r4skqe1n.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> List-Id: References: <201207031218.24797.rjw@sisk.pl> <201207031910.24864.rjw@sisk.pl> <87ipdws1mc.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> In-Reply-To: (Guennadi Liakhovetski's message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:49:37 +0200 (CEST)") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm , Kuninori Morimoto , LKML , Mark Brown , Thomas Gleixner Hi Guennadi, On Tue, Jul 10 2012, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: >> > The latter one looks big because of a rename, but with "-M" it's pretty >> > trivial. Chris, do you agree? >> >> Is the minimal fix to just add "| IRQF_ONESHOT" to the request_threaded_irq >> argument? If so, I'd rather push just that for 3.5, and I can take care of >> having that change appear simultaneously in linux-next so that there aren't >> any conflicts. Is that okay with you? > > For that you'd have to rebase -next, right? you'd like to do that? Yeah, I'm willing to rebase mmc-next for this -- I'd rather send the simplest possible fix this late in 3.5-rc, and the rebase is simple. Also, this fix is logically distinct from your rename patch. I don't think I need you to send anything more, I'll add the initial patch adding "| IRQF_ONESHOT", rebase your "extend and rename" patch on top of that, push both to mmc-next, and then send the initial patch to Linus in a few days. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball One Laptop Per Child