From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com,
arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:45:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ty84tl7n.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110922082840.10520.85895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:58:52 +0530")
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> The following patch series implements global registration of cpuidle
> states, and also has the necessary data structure changes to
> accommodate the per-cpu writable members of the cpuidle_states
> structure.
I reviewed earlier versions of the series, and this version still looks
good to me. Any reason it is still RFC?
Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
and for the OMAP-specific parts,
Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-22 8:40 [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-22 8:42 ` [RFC PATCH V6 1/4] cpuidle: Move dev->last_residency update to driver Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-22 8:43 ` [RFC PATCH V6 2/4] cpuidle: Remove CPUIDLE_FLAG_IGNORE and Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-22 8:44 ` [RFC PATCH V6 3/4] cpuidle: Split cpuidle_state structure and move Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-22 8:46 ` [RFC PATCH V6 4/4] cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states Deepthi Dharwar
2011-09-22 17:35 ` [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global " Arjan van de Ven
2011-09-22 19:37 ` Jean Pihet
2011-09-22 19:45 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-23 11:19 ` Deepthi Dharwar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ty84tl7n.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).