From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Hilman Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:45:32 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V6 0/4] cpuidle: Global registration of idle states with per-cpu statistics Message-Id: <87ty84tl7n.fsf@ti.com> List-Id: References: <20110922082840.10520.85895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> In-Reply-To: <20110922082840.10520.85895.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> (Deepthi Dharwar's message of "Thu, 22 Sep 2011 13:58:52 +0530") MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Deepthi Dharwar Cc: venki@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, len.brown@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org, santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, arjan@linux.intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Deepthi Dharwar writes: > The following patch series implements global registration of cpuidle > states, and also has the necessary data structure changes to > accommodate the per-cpu writable members of the cpuidle_states > structure. I reviewed earlier versions of the series, and this version still looks good to me. Any reason it is still RFC? Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman and for the OMAP-specific parts, Acked-by: Kevin Hilman Kevin