From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Single-stepping with UBC on SH7785
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 07:50:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y5ry9c5t.fsf@schwinge.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sjidcrrn.fsf@schwinge.name>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7726 bytes --]
Hi!
Ping.
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:18:52 +0100, I wrote:
> Upgrading the kernel for it, we noticed that with ``recent'' kernels,
> single-stepping is broken for our SH7785-based board. I tracked this
> down to commit 09a072947791088b88ae15111cf68fc5aaaf758d (2009-11-09),
> ``preliminary support for the SH-4A UBC to the hw-breakpoints API''.
>
> After learning from the SH7785 manual how to use and program the UBC, it
> seemed obvious to me that what it implemented nowadays in
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c for programming the UBC does not match how
> it used to be, so I changed that according to my interpretation of the
> manual, as well as the pre-09a072's
> arch/sh/kernel/process_32.c:__switch_to implementation. This is the
> attached 0001-WIP-Restore-single-stepping-functionality-on-our-SH7.patch.
> Yet, it still wouldn't work.
>
>
> After several hours of grief, I came up with the additional
> 0001-Wire-the-clock-of-the-SH7785-s-UBC-as-expected-in-ub.patch -- and it
> worked! (Meh, so simple...)
>
>
> ... and today I figured out that my first patch isn't even needed -- but
> I don't understand how the current ubc.c implementation gets away with
> not using the asid stuff, for example? And shouldn't it respect the
> reserved value UBC_CRR_RES as well as UBC_CRR_INIT and UBC_CBR_INIT that
> I re-introduced? Also the manual suggests a different order for
> programming the registers.
>
> As soon as someone starts working on adding user-space controlled
> hardware breakpoint and/or watchpoint support, this will need further
> untangling/cleanup.
>
>
> Grüße,
> Thomas
>
>
> From 2942691b300a14eb3751aa687165e1c00da3cedd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:17:47 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] [WIP] Restore single-stepping functionality on our
> SH7785-based board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> ---
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c b/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c
> index efb2745..86c54cc 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/ubc.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
>
> #define UBC_CBR(idx) (0xff200000 + (0x20 * idx))
> #define UBC_CRR(idx) (0xff200004 + (0x20 * idx))
> @@ -24,30 +25,83 @@
> #define UBC_CBCR 0xff200620
>
> /* CRR */
> +#define UBC_CRR_RES (1 << 13)
> #define UBC_CRR_PCB (1 << 1)
> #define UBC_CRR_BIE (1 << 0)
> +#define UBC_CRR_INIT 0x00002000
>
> /* CBR */
> +#define UBC_CBR_AIE (1 << 30)
> +#define UBC_CBR_ID_INST (1 << 4)
> #define UBC_CBR_CE (1 << 0)
> +#define UBC_CBR_INIT 0x20000000
> +
> +#define UBC_CBR_AIV_SET(asid) (((asid) << UBC_CBR_AIV_SHIFT) & UBC_CBR_AIV_MASK)
> +#define UBC_CBR_AIV_SHIFT 16
> +#define UBC_CBR_AIV_MASK 0x00ff0000
>
> static struct sh_ubc sh4a_ubc;
>
> static void sh4a_ubc_enable(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info, int idx)
> {
> +#if 0
> __raw_writel(UBC_CBR_CE | info->len | info->type, UBC_CBR(idx));
> +#else
> + int asid = 0;
> + unsigned long tmp;
> +
> + printk("0x%p\t%s for 0x%lx on channel %d\n", current, __FUNCTION__, info->address, idx);
> +
> +//#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> +// asid = cpu_asid(smp_processor_id(), current->mm);
> + asid = get_asid();
> +//#endif
> +
> + tmp = UBC_CBR_CE
> + | UBC_CBR_ID_INST
> + | UBC_CBR_AIE
> + | UBC_CBR_AIV_SET(asid)
> + /* | info->len */
> + /* | info->type */ | (1 << 1);
> + __raw_writel(tmp, UBC_CBR(idx));
> + printk(" asid 0x%x, CBR: %lx", asid, tmp);
> +#endif
> __raw_writel(info->address, UBC_CAR(idx));
> +
> + __raw_writel(0, UBC_CAMR(idx));
> +
> +// __raw_writel(0, UBC_CBCR);
> +
> + tmp = UBC_CRR_BIE
> + | UBC_CRR_PCB
> + | UBC_CRR_RES;
> + __raw_writel(tmp, UBC_CRR(idx));
> + printk(", CRR: %lx\n", tmp);
> +
> + /* dummy read for write posting */
> + (void) __raw_readl(UBC_CBR(idx));
> + (void) __raw_readl(UBC_CRR(idx));
> }
>
> static void sh4a_ubc_disable(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *info, int idx)
> {
> + printk("0x%p\t%s for 0x%lx on channel %d\n", current, __FUNCTION__, info->address, idx);
> +
> +#if 0
> __raw_writel(0, UBC_CBR(idx));
> __raw_writel(0, UBC_CAR(idx));
> +#else
> + __raw_writel(UBC_CBR_INIT, UBC_CBR(idx));
> + __raw_writel(UBC_CRR_INIT, UBC_CRR(idx));
> +#endif
> }
>
> static void sh4a_ubc_enable_all(unsigned long mask)
> {
> int i;
>
> + printk("0x%p\t%s with mask 0x%lx\n", current, __FUNCTION__, mask);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sh4a_ubc.num_events; i++)
> if (mask & (1 << i))
> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(UBC_CBR(i)) | UBC_CBR_CE,
> @@ -58,6 +112,8 @@ static void sh4a_ubc_disable_all(void)
> {
> int i;
>
> + printk("0x%p\t%s\n", current, __FUNCTION__);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sh4a_ubc.num_events; i++)
> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(UBC_CBR(i)) & ~UBC_CBR_CE,
> UBC_CBR(i));
> @@ -68,6 +124,8 @@ static unsigned long sh4a_ubc_active_mask(void)
> unsigned long active = 0;
> int i;
>
> + printk("0x%p\t%s\n", current, __FUNCTION__);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < sh4a_ubc.num_events; i++)
> if (__raw_readl(UBC_CBR(i)) & UBC_CBR_CE)
> active |= (1 << i);
> @@ -77,11 +135,15 @@ static unsigned long sh4a_ubc_active_mask(void)
>
> static unsigned long sh4a_ubc_triggered_mask(void)
> {
> + printk("0x%p\t%s\n", current, __FUNCTION__);
> +
> return __raw_readl(UBC_CCMFR);
> }
>
> static void sh4a_ubc_clear_triggered_mask(unsigned long mask)
> {
> + printk("0x%p\t%s with mask 0x%lx\n", current, __FUNCTION__, mask);
> +
> __raw_writel(__raw_readl(UBC_CCMFR) & ~mask, UBC_CCMFR);
> }
>
> @@ -114,15 +176,18 @@ static int __init sh4a_ubc_init(void)
>
> __raw_writel(0, UBC_CBCR);
>
> +#if 0
> for (i = 0; i < sh4a_ubc.num_events; i++) {
> __raw_writel(0, UBC_CAMR(i));
> __raw_writel(0, UBC_CBR(i));
>
> - __raw_writel(UBC_CRR_BIE | UBC_CRR_PCB, UBC_CRR(i));
> +// __raw_writel(UBC_CRR_BIE | UBC_CRR_PCB, UBC_CRR(i));
> + __raw_writel(UBC_CRR_BIE | UBC_CRR_PCB | UBC_CRR_RES, UBC_CRR(i));
>
> /* dummy read for write posting */
> (void)__raw_readl(UBC_CRR(i));
> }
> +#endif
>
> clk_disable(ubc_iclk);
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
> From c6696f9fcffcce6739449ea681a38c30e4799017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:19:49 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Wire the clock of the SH7785's UBC as expected in ubc.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
> ---
> arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/clock-sh7785.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/clock-sh7785.c b/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/clock-sh7785.c
> index e5b420c..2b31443 100644
> --- a/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/clock-sh7785.c
> +++ b/arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/clock-sh7785.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = {
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("siof_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP003]),
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("hspi_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP002]),
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("hudi_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP119]),
> - CLKDEV_CON_ID("ubc_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP117]),
> + CLKDEV_CON_ID("ubc0", &mstp_clks[MSTP117]),
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("dmac_11_6_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP105]),
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("dmac_5_0_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP104]),
> CLKDEV_CON_ID("gdta_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP100]),
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
Grüße,
Thomas
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 489 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-20 7:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-14 16:18 Single-stepping with UBC on SH7785 Thomas Schwinge
2012-02-20 7:50 ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2012-02-24 5:36 ` Paul Mundt
2012-03-01 15:50 ` Thomas Schwinge
2012-03-22 3:25 ` Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y5ry9c5t.fsf@schwinge.name \
--to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).