From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:12:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150402191230.GA24219@linaro.org>
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Lina Iyer <lina.iyer@linaro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 01 2015 at 15:57 -0600, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 10:47:49 +0100 Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > -static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, free_page_t
>>>> > put_new_page,
>>>> > - unsigned long private, struct page *page, int
>>>> > force,
>>>> > - enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>> > +static noinline int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page,
>>>> > + free_page_t put_new_page,
>>>> > + unsigned long private, struct page
>>>> > *page,
>>>> > + int force, enum migrate_mode mode)
>>>> > {
>>>> > int rc = 0;
>>>> > int *result = NULL;
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> Ouch. That's really ugly. And on 32bit ARM, we end-up spilling half of
>>>> the parameters on the stack, which is not going to help performance
>>>> either (not that this would be useful on 32bit ARM anyway...).
>>>>
>>>> Any chance you could make this dependent on some compiler detection
>>>> mechanism?
>>>
>>>
>>> With my arm compiler (gcc-4.4.4) the patch makes no difference -
>>> unmap_and_move() isn't being inlined anyway.
>>>
>>> How does this look?
>>>
>>> Kevin, could you please retest? I might have fat-fingered something...
>>
>>
>> Your patch on top of Geert's still compiles fine for me with gcc-4.7.3.
>> However, I'm not sure how specific we can be on the versions.
>>
>> /me goes to test a few more compilers... OK...
>>
>> ICE: 4.7.1, 4.7.3, 4.8.3
>> OK: 4.6.3, 4.9.2, 4.9.3
>>
>> The diff below[2] on top of yours compiles fine here and at least covers
>> the compilers I *know* to trigger the ICE.
>
>
> I see ICE on arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.7.4-2ubuntu1) 4.7.4
>
Thanks for checking. I'm assuming my patch fixes it for your since
that should catch any 4.7.x compiler.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-24 0:45 Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Simon Horman
2015-03-24 0:52 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24 0:53 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-24 8:31 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-24 16:13 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-03-26 0:39 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-26 13:36 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-26 15:29 ` Tyler Baker
2015-03-27 0:25 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 10:06 ` Will Deacon
2015-03-27 11:55 ` Simon Horman
2015-03-27 15:18 ` Tyler Baker
[not found] ` <7hbnj99epe.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
2015-03-31 21:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-03-31 22:10 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 9:37 ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 (was: Re: Possible re Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-01 9:47 ` [PATCH] mm/migrate: Mark unmap_and_move() "noinline" to avoid ICE in gcc 4.7.3 Marc Zyngier
2015-04-01 19:40 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-01 21:54 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 21:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-04-02 7:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-04-02 19:12 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-02 21:12 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2015-04-02 21:53 ` Lina Iyer
2015-04-07 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 22:41 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 22:53 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-07 23:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-07 23:36 ` Andrew Morton
2015-04-08 0:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 19:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-04-01 8:58 ` Possible regression in next-20150323 due to "ARM, arm64: kvm: get rid of the bounce page" Will Deacon
2015-04-01 13:54 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-04-01 18:12 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMAWPa_P5JFQsrL96KPnt0gu=P4O40cGbWkM1j6b6HGy4edErQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).