From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 08:57:40 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: soc_camera: rcar_vin: Add rcar fallback compatibility string Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1452707918-4321-1-git-send-email-ykaneko0929@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Guennadi Liakhovetski Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko , Linux Media Mailing List , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Linux-sh list Hi Guennadi, On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, Yoshihiro Kaneko wrote: >> Add fallback compatibility string for R-Car Gen2 and Gen3, This is >> in keeping with the fallback scheme being adopted wherever appropriate >> for drivers for Renesas SoCs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Kaneko >> --- >> >> This patch is based on the for-4.6-1 branch of Guennadi's v4l-dvb tree. >> >> v3 [Yoshihiro Kaneko] >> * rebased to for-4.6-1 branch of Guennadi's tree. >> >> v2 [Yoshihiro Kaneko] >> * As suggested by Geert Uytterhoeven >> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c: >> - The generic compatibility values are listed at the end of the >> rcar_vin_of_table[]. >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rcar_vin.txt | 8 +++++++- >> drivers/media/platform/soc_camera/rcar_vin.c | 2 ++ > > I might be wrong in this specific case, please, correct me someone, but > doesn't Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt tell us > to submit bindings patches separately from the drivers part? I think that mostly applies to new bindings and new drivers. For small updates (e.g. adding a new compatible value), these tend to be submitted as a single patch. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds