From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:49:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] sh_eth: Remove obsolete platform_device_id entries Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1444205657-25314-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <20151008.051023.991121515814557831.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20151008.051023.991121515814557831.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: David Miller Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Arnd Bergmann Hi David, [CC Arnd wearing the arm-soc merge hat] On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:10 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: Geert Uytterhoeven > Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:14:13 +0200 > >> Since commit 3d7608e4c169af03 ("ARM: shmobile: bockw: remove legacy >> board file and config"), which is now in arm-soc/for-next, shmobile SoCs >> are only supported in generic DT-only ARM multi-platform builds. >> The sh_eth driver doesn't need to match platform devices by name >> anymore, hence this series removes the corresponding platform_device_id >> entries. >> >> Changes since v1: >> - Protect some data and functions by #ifdef CONFIG_OF to silence >> unused compiler warnings on SH, >> - New patches 3 and 4. > > Since that commit isn't in any of my trees why don't you merge this > via arm-soc/for-next? This series just changes the sh_eth driver. There's no direct dependency on the arm-soc changes. Hence I think the sh_eth changes should go in through the netdev tree. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds