From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: serial core: crash / race condition on unbind
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 16:55:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVV_NrQ3PPJwPNx7MoM9TWLdk02d+10zNipNcC7VC0HAA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
When unbinding a serial driver, uart_remove_one_port() clears
uart_state.uart_port:
state->uart_port = NULL;
If the serial port is still in use (e.g. by getty), uart_close() will be
called later:
static void uart_close(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *filp)
{
struct uart_state *state = tty->driver_data;
struct uart_port *uport;
...
if (!state)
return;
uport = state->uart_port;
uport is NULL
...
pr_debug("uart_close(%d) called\n", uport->line);
If debugging is enabled, it will already crash here while dereferencing uport
(this one is easily fixed)
if (tty_port_close_start(port, tty, filp) = 0)
return;
...
uart_flush_buffer(tty);
uart_flush_buffer() will try to obtain the port's spinlock:
static void uart_flush_buffer(struct tty_struct *tty)
{
struct uart_state *state = tty->driver_data;
struct uart_port *port;
...
port = state->uart_port;
port is NULL
...
spin_lock_irqsave(&port->lock, flags);
Crash!!
It doesn't always crash, though.
Sometimes uart_close() returns after the tty_port_close_start() above,
without a crash (bypassing e.g. the call to uart_change_pm() :-(
Sometimes it crashs in uart_chars_in_buffer(), which also tries to take the
spinlock:
tty_port_close_start()
tty_wait_until_sent_from_close()
tty_wait_until_sent()
tty_chars_in_buffer()
uart_chars_in_buffer()
spin_lock_irqsave(&state->uart_port->lock, flags);
I'm not that familiar with the internals of the serial core. Perhaps
uart_close()
should return early if uport is NULL, just like if state is NULL?
However, that means the uart_change_pm(state, UART_PM_STATE_OFF)
is bypassed again.
This is with sh-sci, but I don't think the driver matters.
Thanks for your comments and suggestions!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next reply other threads:[~2014-03-07 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-07 16:55 Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2014-03-10 20:48 ` serial core: crash / race condition on unbind Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-11 3:14 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-11 10:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-11 11:49 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-11 12:00 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2014-03-11 15:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-03-11 22:59 ` Peter Hurley
2014-03-13 7:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdVV_NrQ3PPJwPNx7MoM9TWLdk02d+10zNipNcC7VC0HAA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).