From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:48:44 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MAINTAINERS: return arch/sh to maintained state, with new maintainers Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20160108043907.GA7005@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160108043959.GA7856@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160111175307.GC6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20160113014046.GA22101@verge.net.au> <20160115005229.GB238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20160117023247.GJ238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20160117023247.GJ238@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rich Felker Cc: Yoshinori Sato , Linux-sh list , Simon Horman , Peter Zijlstra , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andrew Morton , "D. Jeff Dionne" , Rob Landley Hi Rich, On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:31:13AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 1:52 AM, Rich Felker wrote: >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:40:46AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:53:07PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:39:59PM -0500, Rich Felker wrote: >> >> > > From: Rich Felker >> >> > > >> >> > > Add Yoshinori Sato and Rich Felker as maintainers for arch/sh >> >> > > (SUPERH). >> > While patch 2/2 still seems to need discussion and resolution, I don't >> > think this part (1/2, adding us as maintainers) is controversial. Can >> > it be committed now? Geert? Andrew? >> >> I think it should go in either through Andrew, or through yourself, depending >> on whether you already have other stuff ready for this merge window, and have >> a git repo to pull from. >> >> Do you have a git repository to ask Linus to pull from, and to provide a branch >> for linux-next integration testing? > > Not quite yet. If it can be done in this merge window, I think it > makes sense for Andrew to do it to make it official that arch/sh isn't > abandoned, and Sato-san and I can have the repo setup well ahead of > the next window. How does that sound? That sounds fine to me. > I'd love it if we could get some of the actual code changes in for > this merge window too but I'm not clear whether there's still time. I don't think there's a reason to hurry. People can start using your tree as soon as it becomes public. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds