From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] ARM: shmobile: Convert to hotplug state machine
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:05:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWOZnL1cACUHSK+3T7CYenOci3Jx226cK6C0vq9RssjWw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160906170457.32393-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Hi Sebastian,
CC linux-renesas-soc
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:04 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<bigeasy@linutronix.de> wrote:
> Install the callbacks via the state machine.
Please describe why this is desirable.
> Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
> include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c
> index 8d478f1da265..d1ecaf37d142 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-scu.c
> @@ -21,26 +21,14 @@
> static phys_addr_t shmobile_scu_base_phys;
> static void __iomem *shmobile_scu_base;
>
> -static int shmobile_smp_scu_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nfb,
> - unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +static int shmobile_scu_cpu_prepare(unsigned int cpu)
> {
> - unsigned int cpu = (long)hcpu;
> -
> - switch (action) {
> - case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> - /* For this particular CPU register SCU SMP boot vector */
> - shmobile_smp_hook(cpu, virt_to_phys(shmobile_boot_scu),
> - shmobile_scu_base_phys);
> - break;
> - };
> -
> - return NOTIFY_OK;
> + /* For this particular CPU register SCU SMP boot vector */
> + shmobile_smp_hook(cpu, virt_to_phys(shmobile_boot_scu),
> + shmobile_scu_base_phys);
> + return 0;
> }
>
> -static struct notifier_block shmobile_smp_scu_notifier = {
> - .notifier_call = shmobile_smp_scu_notifier_call,
> -};
> -
> void __init shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(phys_addr_t scu_base_phys,
> unsigned int max_cpus)
> {
> @@ -54,7 +42,9 @@ void __init shmobile_smp_scu_prepare_cpus(phys_addr_t scu_base_phys,
> scu_power_mode(shmobile_scu_base, SCU_PM_NORMAL);
>
> /* Use CPU notifier for reset vector control */
> - register_cpu_notifier(&shmobile_smp_scu_notifier);
> + cpuhp_setup_state_nocalls(CPUHP_ARM_SHMOBILE_SCU_PREPARE,
> + "arm/shmobile-scu:prepare",
> + shmobile_scu_cpu_prepare, NULL);
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> index 0da071ff36d2..008eed0c0787 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuhotplug.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ enum cpuhp_state {
> CPUHP_POWERPC_PMAC_PREPARE,
> CPUHP_POWERPC_MMU_CTX_PREPARE,
> CPUHP_NOTIFY_PREPARE,
> + CPUHP_ARM_SHMOBILE_SCU_PREPARE,
> CPUHP_TIMERS_DEAD,
> CPUHP_BRINGUP_CPU,
> CPUHP_AP_IDLE_DEAD,
What's the rationale behind adding all these numbers and always
iterating over all
of them, even though most/all of them cannot be used at the same time
(e.g. CPUHP_SH_SH3X_PREPARE is for SuperH, while
CPUHP_ARM_SHMOBILE_SCU_PREPARE is for ARM)?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-06 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160906170457.32393-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
2016-09-06 17:04 ` [PATCH 02/21] ARM: shmobile: Convert to hotplug state machine Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-09-06 18:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2016-09-07 13:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-09-06 17:04 ` [PATCH 05/21] sh: SH-X3 SMP: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMuHMdWOZnL1cACUHSK+3T7CYenOci3Jx226cK6C0vq9RssjWw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).