From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:33:28 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][RFC] dmaengine: rcar-audmapp: calculate chcr via src/dst addr Message-Id: List-Id: References: <8761ekokpf.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <877fw6tm4v.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <8761bqtm34.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <16757441.qC3ryuq0R5@wuerfel> In-Reply-To: <16757441.qC3ryuq0R5@wuerfel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Kuninori Morimoto , Magnus Damm , Laurent Pinchart , Vinod Koul , Mark Brown , Mark Brown , Simon , Rob Herring , Linux-SH , Linux-ALSA , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 29 January 2015 01:24:06 Kuninori Morimoto wrote: >> Current rcar-audmapp is assuming that CHCR value are specified >> from platform data or DTS bindings. but, it is possible to >> calculate CHCR settings from src/dst address. >> DTS bindings node can be reduced by this patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto > > The intention definitely looks good, but I'm worried that the > table you add here might be too SoC specific. > >> +struct id_addr_table { >> + u8 id; >> + u16 addr; >> +}; >> + >> +static u32 audmapp_addr_to_id(struct device *dev, u32 addr) >> +{ >> + struct id_addr_table ssi_id_table[] = { static const, so they don't get copied to the stack on every invocation. >> + {0x00, 0x0000}, /* SSI00 */ >> + {0x01, 0x0400}, /* SSI01 */ >> + {0x02, 0x0800}, /* SSI02 */ >> + {0x03, 0x0C00}, /* SSI03 */ >> + {0x04, 0x1000}, /* SSI10 */ >> + {0x05, 0x1400}, /* SSI11 */ >> + {0x06, 0x1800}, /* SSI12 */ >> + {0x07, 0x1C00}, /* SSI13 */ >> + {0x08, 0x2000}, /* SSI20 */ > > Isn't the address part here the physical address of the FIFO, Yes they are. > which can be different for each implementation that contains > an audmapp device? Fortunately they're identical for all (current) members of the R-Car Gen2 family. Morimoto-san: Are the base addresses configured in DT? I did a quick search for 0xec300000, 0xec320000, 0xec40000, 0xec420000, and 0xec000000, and couldn't find them in DT, only in source code (comments). They must come from somewhere? Note that I didn't follow the sound binding discussions that closely. Thanks! Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds