From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 07:54:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/12] of: add J-Core cpu bindings Message-Id: List-Id: References: <39ad5c69533ef537e6ab0426efc057f9064ee581.1464148904.git.dalias@libc.org> <20160525102214.GF1337@leverpostej> <20160525230407.GT21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> In-Reply-To: <20160525230407.GT21636@brightrain.aerifal.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Rich Felker Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux-sh list , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Pawel Moll , Rob Herring Hi Rich, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Rich Felker wrote: > If you really do want a lot more detail for SMP-related bindings, I > could consider submitting a version with SMP omitted for now (since > the kernel patches submitted at this point don't include SMP) and do > the addition of SMP as a separate patch later. But with the launch of > open-hardware boards capable of running SMP J2 systems (see > https://twitter.com/jcoreeng/status/730330848306700288) near, I'd like > to be getting bindings we can use stabilized so that we're properly > including DTB in the boot rom and not relying on external DTB files or > linking DTB in kernel. Submitting a version now without SMP is indeed a good idea, and allows to move forward. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds