From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 530EF2575B; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="GsmfaT9v"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="7ScbUFE/"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="GsmfaT9v"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.cz header.i=@suse.cz header.b="7ScbUFE/" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4071F795; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:07:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704708422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R99rqxoGR/Qlzqgu2a6HJKzxAx4tDUpg3SJMoXbVjNk=; b=GsmfaT9vT5a2rd85NnzGqeWRbuuq3hTMlT1avysMx1ORSgDDgY+/MFoxWcl6VBFexV6GyC m8W2Cydfw4v0Qx4Bagq4PPXa7Gua3JJbzmtP4RSMW3hGUKn4xm0YP9qQfEUI2SwCdpmIXx mZwBi9cpv7TZ1vvxwbqMG6rS1GFFaV4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704708422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R99rqxoGR/Qlzqgu2a6HJKzxAx4tDUpg3SJMoXbVjNk=; b=7ScbUFE/CJ4U26UvCsuT6MZhX96dkM3iqYXqnjxi/FbgcAHJn3yVZixO3KDB0KCmmaWvcJ 9xYfLEbYp9QfauAw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704708422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R99rqxoGR/Qlzqgu2a6HJKzxAx4tDUpg3SJMoXbVjNk=; b=GsmfaT9vT5a2rd85NnzGqeWRbuuq3hTMlT1avysMx1ORSgDDgY+/MFoxWcl6VBFexV6GyC m8W2Cydfw4v0Qx4Bagq4PPXa7Gua3JJbzmtP4RSMW3hGUKn4xm0YP9qQfEUI2SwCdpmIXx mZwBi9cpv7TZ1vvxwbqMG6rS1GFFaV4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704708422; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=R99rqxoGR/Qlzqgu2a6HJKzxAx4tDUpg3SJMoXbVjNk=; b=7ScbUFE/CJ4U26UvCsuT6MZhX96dkM3iqYXqnjxi/FbgcAHJn3yVZixO3KDB0KCmmaWvcJ 9xYfLEbYp9QfauAw== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 512331392C; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id sMOXEkbJm2UrNgAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:07:02 +0000 Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 11:07:25 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Cc: Rob Landley , Geert Uytterhoeven , ltp@lists.linux.it, Li Wang , Andrea Cervesato , Greg Ungerer , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Christophe Lyon , linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM , linux-riscv , Linux-sh list , automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, buildroot@buildroot.org, Niklas Cassel Subject: Re: Call for nommu LTP maintainer [was: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP] Message-ID: References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz> <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik> <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net> <20240105131135.GA1484621@pevik> <90c1ddc1-c608-30fc-d5aa-fdf63c90d055@landley.net> <20240108090338.GA1552643@pevik> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240108090338.GA1552643@pevik> X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=GsmfaT9v; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b="7ScbUFE/" X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[19]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim,suse.cz:email]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F4071F795 X-Spam-Flag: NO Hi! > But as I said, if anybody from nommu decides to maintain it in LTP, I'll try to > support him in my free time (review patches, give advices). And if nobody > stands, this patchset which removes the support in the old API will be merged > after next LTP release (in the end of January). Let me highlight this part, we are eager to help anybody who is willing to pick the nommu work, but we do not have resources to drive it. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz