From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA88D199C2; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721635881; cv=none; b=ccvud8nYshYxWjrQikDyy23/R3uuY2tsvMhPCp3c1ijWq58JCvFodzKiUYaf7yBY+OhnrqPRBjExd0FcwqfCxIudGw1q6o/GNohQqV3st86PpR2dWWp/89ewQQzp5NPThaeOIZU1CxjK0TOaPmiDWgPOOyLSEELwOymbE6LHu0Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721635881; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KbHb2ML+/qNtqrROpXFQuCOgzyU9WkoEjmRDGSn9Buc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lytYPElcsaEAhjoWR/hyoAtzlK0nlvcdMhRARmkGDpXX4RvMrChAfrgBzUo8w1c0WmbZjeSWTSmw4j8XH3KvQab3j9++bt3uQGN/TMAfSlqCAq23GA8/aEPXiEc9LJMBw0+q5Iq3jGxmGGnG5H7bV4zW+VU1YML9u+upzIl8o3Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pmvGwQdU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pmvGwQdU" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3697C32782; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 08:11:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1721635881; bh=KbHb2ML+/qNtqrROpXFQuCOgzyU9WkoEjmRDGSn9Buc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=pmvGwQdUNlDOWhEh5LDwssibR/KEz7Zmmpd8mKQJ30oNCDnjOOYBrxm5QxDheiGpM v2fA6aKX+vgggaKwCAygIbGfh8J+i/6ypRPQfXQm/pPLVwBpHQQ0ePGi/iWCBNnGNs K6/E4TEMVX41pv99/WxiNTZpZsJ7u7AUQO0/nnACqOE2r61ablwa38hrfn24gKR7af 4ZwCTnQ0nxsiA1qRrmHJI/3vt9VXGn+Doo9wPFkpJ1m8ADDfzpc1fqTbeg7JemtZZV hWVZyVEHXLgElOCdvOBrZYp1YKgEEly5/oGP5VPwn2hJw/yrNojdPai/kIldbMKfjo Li75LtSqlZlhA== Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:08:11 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Gordeev , Andreas Larsson , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Borislav Petkov , Catalin Marinas , Christophe Leroy , Dan Williams , Dave Hansen , David Hildenbrand , "David S. Miller" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Heiko Carstens , Huacai Chen , Ingo Molnar , Jiaxun Yang , John Paul Adrian Glaubitz , Michael Ellerman , Palmer Dabbelt , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Rob Herring , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Thomas Gleixner , Vasily Gorbik , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] mm: introduce numa_memblks Message-ID: References: <20240716111346.3676969-1-rppt@kernel.org> <20240719143347.000077d9@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240719143347.000077d9@huawei.com> On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 02:33:47PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 14:13:29 +0300 > Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" > > > > Hi, > > > > Following the discussion about handling of CXL fixed memory windows on > > arm64 [1] I decided to bite the bullet and move numa_memblks from x86 to > > the generic code so they will be available on arm64/riscv and maybe on > > loongarch sometime later. > > > > While it could be possible to use memblock to describe CXL memory windows, > > it currently lacks notion of unpopulated memory ranges and numa_memblks > > does implement this. > > > > Another reason to make numa_memblks generic is that both arch_numa (arm64 > > and riscv) and loongarch use trimmed copy of x86 code although there is no > > fundamental reason why the same code cannot be used on all these platforms. > > Having numa_memblks in mm/ will make it's interaction with ACPI and FDT > > more consistent and I believe will reduce maintenance burden. > > > > And with generic numa_memblks it is (almost) straightforward to enable NUMA > > emulation on arm64 and riscv. > > > > The first 5 commits in this series are cleanups that are not strictly > > related to numa_memblks. > > > > Commits 6-11 slightly reorder code in x86 to allow extracting numa_memblks > > and NUMA emulation to the generic code. > > > > Commits 12-14 actually move the code from arch/x86/ to mm/ and commit 15 > > does some aftermath cleanups. > > > > Commit 16 switches arch_numa to numa_memblks. > > > > Commit 17 enables usage of phys_to_target_node() and > > memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() with numa_memblks. > > Hi Mike, > > I've lightly tested with emulated CXL + Generic Ports and Generic > Initiators as well as more normal cpus and memory via qemu on arm64 and it's > looking good. > > From my earlier series, patch 4 is probably still needed to avoid > presenting nodes with nothing in them at boot (but not if we hotplug > memory then remove it again in which case they disappear) > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-5-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/ > However that was broken/inconsistent before your rework so I can send that > patch separately. I'd appreciate it :) > Thanks for getting this sorted! I should get time to do more extensive > testing and review in next week or so. Thanks, you may want to wait for v2, I'm planning to send it this week. > Jonathan > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240529171236.32002-1-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com/ > > > > Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) (17): > > mm: move kernel/numa.c to mm/ > > MIPS: sgi-ip27: make NODE_DATA() the same as on all other > > architectures > > MIPS: loongson64: rename __node_data to node_data > > arch, mm: move definition of node_data to generic code > > arch, mm: pull out allocation of NODE_DATA to generic code > > x86/numa: simplify numa_distance allocation > > x86/numa: move FAKE_NODE_* defines to numa_emu > > x86/numa_emu: simplify allocation of phys_dist > > x86/numa_emu: split __apicid_to_node update to a helper function > > x86/numa_emu: use a helper function to get MAX_DMA32_PFN > > x86/numa: numa_{add,remove}_cpu: make cpu parameter unsigned > > mm: introduce numa_memblks > > mm: move numa_distance and related code from x86 to numa_memblks > > mm: introduce numa_emulation > > mm: make numa_memblks more self-contained > > arch_numa: switch over to numa_memblks > > mm: make range-to-target_node lookup facility a part of numa_memblks > > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 - > > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 1 + > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h | 16 - > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/topology.h | 1 + > > arch/loongarch/kernel/numa.c | 21 - > > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-ip27/mmzone.h | 1 - > > .../mips/include/asm/mach-loongson64/mmzone.h | 4 - > > arch/mips/loongson64/numa.c | 20 +- > > arch/mips/sgi-ip27/ip27-memory.c | 2 +- > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 - > > arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 26 +- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h | 13 - > > arch/riscv/include/asm/topology.h | 4 + > > arch/s390/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h | 17 - > > arch/s390/kernel/numa.c | 3 - > > arch/sh/include/asm/mmzone.h | 3 - > > arch/sh/mm/init.c | 7 +- > > arch/sh/mm/numa.c | 3 - > > arch/sparc/include/asm/mmzone.h | 4 - > > arch/sparc/mm/init_64.c | 11 +- > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 9 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/Kbuild | 1 + > > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h | 6 - > > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h | 17 - > > arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h | 18 - > > arch/x86/include/asm/numa.h | 24 +- > > arch/x86/include/asm/sparsemem.h | 9 - > > arch/x86/mm/Makefile | 1 - > > arch/x86/mm/amdtopology.c | 1 + > > arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 618 +----------------- > > arch/x86/mm/numa_internal.h | 24 - > > drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 1 + > > drivers/base/Kconfig | 1 + > > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 223 ++----- > > drivers/cxl/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/dax/Kconfig | 2 +- > > drivers/of/of_numa.c | 1 + > > include/asm-generic/mmzone.h | 5 + > > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 6 +- > > include/linux/numa.h | 5 + > > include/linux/numa_memblks.h | 58 ++ > > kernel/Makefile | 1 - > > kernel/numa.c | 26 - > > mm/Kconfig | 11 + > > mm/Makefile | 3 + > > mm/numa.c | 57 ++ > > {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c | 42 +- > > mm/numa_memblks.c | 565 ++++++++++++++++ > > 52 files changed, 847 insertions(+), 1070 deletions(-) > > delete mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mmzone.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/loongarch/include/asm/mmzone.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/s390/include/asm/mmzone.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h > > delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_64.h > > create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/mmzone.h > > create mode 100644 include/linux/numa_memblks.h > > delete mode 100644 kernel/numa.c > > create mode 100644 mm/numa.c > > rename {arch/x86/mm => mm}/numa_emulation.c (94%) > > create mode 100644 mm/numa_memblks.c > > > > > > base-commit: 22a40d14b572deb80c0648557f4bd502d7e83826 > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.