From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Magnus Damm Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:15:12 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] sh: suspend interpreter V1 Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20090323091739.25647.6773.sendpatchset@rx1.opensource.se> In-Reply-To: <20090323091739.25647.6773.sendpatchset@rx1.opensource.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Paul Mundt wrote: > We need to see hard requirements here, in technical detail, not > hand-waving about needing to be flexible for parts and requirements that > never materialize. Assembly stubs do work for the vast majority of cases > we have today, and the current model fits the CPU/board split pretty > well. Yes, assembly stubs work fine for the SuperH Mobile sleep modes implemented so far. I suspect that upcoming "R-standby mode" will be easier to support with an interpreter though. Time will tell. Francesco, if you feel like it and have time available, please consider submitting support for some ST cpu/board combination upstream. That may make it easier to motivate why an interpreter is needed. Cheers, / magnus