From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:54:50 +0000
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] sh updates for 2.6.33-rc7
Message-Id: <fa686aa41002020554k2d09c835u781f47e69674d051@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20100202040628.GH13428@linux-sh.org> <fa686aa41002020017m5ea0020di6924905a631dc7d6@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100202082144.GB5716@linux-sh.org> <fa686aa41002020031r38e6bc9eyfce6476d86d47ec2@mail.gmail.com>
	<20100202084659.GC5716@linux-sh.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100202084659.GC5716@linux-sh.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, spi-devel-general@lists.sourceforge.net

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> wrote:
> Ahh.. this is where the confusion came from. The initial version of the
> patch was only posted to the sh list, Magnus asked for it to be reposted
> to the spi list and I hadn't heard anything about it since then, so I
> assumed the poster just disappeared and I just cleaned it up and applied
> it by hand. Apparently it was reposted but the sh list was dropped, so I
> never saw the updated version. If I had known that it had hit the SPI
> list I would have followed up there, I'll be more careful next time now
> that I know someone is paying attention :-)

:-)  Thanks.

g.