From: hamhey <hamhey_m@mx.dpimail.net>
To: linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dual Processor
Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 12:14:30 +0430 (IRST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200205270738.g4R7c0v29422@dpimail.net> (raw)
Dear sir,
I need your help bacause I tried again and again and I think I've read the
documentation of kernel that found.
Here is a short history of what I've done so far:
The server has ASUS CUV4X-D mainboard with Intel Celeron PIII 800 Mhz CPU. The
bios was 10.14 (downgraded to 10.10 and to upgraded again to 1.14 without any
result).
Boot of the server shows that the 2 of the processors are recognized and SMP is
enabled in the bios setting.
The kernel version included in Redhat 7.1 is 2.4.2 which enables the SMP by
default in installation and get the error message when booting SMP and getting
IO-APIC error.
The os can be booted to Linux-up which is one processor enabled. I tried with a
higher version of kernel, 2.5.8 with the same result.
The server will run web server and database. Would you mind giving some details
of what you meen by
"noapic" option on the boot command line.
How can I put this command in files to boot.
Can I fix the interupt problem.
Thanks in advance
Hamid
---------------------------------------------------------------
>X-Sieve: cmu-sieve 2.0
>From: "Vladimir G. Ivanovic" <vladimir@acm.org>
>To: hamhey <hamhey_m@peyk.dpimail.net>
>Cc: linux-smp@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: Dual Processor
>Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8)
>Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 17:41:15 -0700
>X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (peyk)
>
>I recommend that you search the linux-smp archives or use a search
>engine to look on the WWW for the answer to your questions *before*
>asking a mailing list. That way people don't have to answer the same
>question again and again.
>
>If you had done so, you would have discovered that you should set you
>MPS setting in the BIOS to 1.1 and reboot. If you are still having
>problems, make sure you have the lastest BIOS (rev 1014?) and/or use the
>"noapic" option on the boot command line.
>
>IO-APIC allows both processors to field interrupts. Without IO-APIC,
>only one processor does. Usually, for a desktop machine, this is not a
>calamity. For a web server, it's more of an issue.
>
>If everything is working, your /proc/interrupts should look something
>like:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> 0: 1255948 1257289 IO-APIC-edge timer
> 1: 15469 15349 IO-APIC-edge keyboard
> 2: 0 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 4: 11163 10377 IO-APIC-edge serial
> 5: 79559 79534 IO-APIC-level es1371, usb-uhci, usb-uhci
> 8: 9869264 9862018 IO-APIC-edge rtc
> 9: 17601 17613 IO-APIC-level sym53c8xx
> 10: 109682 109643 IO-APIC-level eth0
> 11: 47 50 IO-APIC-level sym53c8xx
> 12: 136004 138160 IO-APIC-edge PS/2 Mouse
> 14: 224 134 IO-APIC-edge ide0
> 15: 29773 28616 IO-APIC-edge ide1
>NMI: 0 0
>LOC: 2513322 2513376
>ERR: 0
>MIS: 0
>
>
>--- Vladimir
>
>--------
>Vladimir G. Ivanovic http://leonora.org/~vladimir
>2770 Cowper St. vladimir@acm.org
>Palo Alto, CA 94306-2447 +1 650 678 8014
>
>"hm" == hamhey m <hamhey> writes:
>
> hm> Dear sir/madam
> hm> I installed Linux redhat 7.1 on Intel platform running 2x Intel-800 Mhz
> hm> processor on ASUS CUV4x-D mother board.
> hm> One of the CPUs is not cooming up due to the following error message at
boot:
>
> hm> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> hm> Total of 2 processors activated (3207.98 Bogo MIPS). Before bogomips.
> hm> Boot done.
> hm> ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs
> hm> ... changing IO_APIC physical APIC ID to 2 .. ok.
> hm> Syc=nchronizing Arb IDs
> hm> TIMER: vector=49 Pin1=2 testing the IO APIC pin2=0
>
> hm> WARNING: Unexpected IO-APIC IRQs
>
> hm> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> hm> Would you mind giving me the reason of getting the reason of the error
message
> hm> at boot time and the system is comming with just on CPU without any
problem
> hm> choosing Linux-Up option for booting.
>
>
> hm> Thanks
> hm> Hamdi
>
> hm> -
> hm> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-smp" in
> hm> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> hm> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
next reply other threads:[~2002-05-27 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-27 7:44 hamhey [this message]
2002-06-18 14:15 ` Dual Processor E. Robert Bogusta
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-05-14 13:46 hamhey
2002-05-15 0:41 ` Vladimir G. Ivanovic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200205270738.g4R7c0v29422@dpimail.net \
--to=hamhey_m@mx.dpimail.net \
--cc=linux-smp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox