From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Kernel Load Warnings Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 15:19:26 +0100 Sender: linux-smp-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021119151926.B26663@suse.de> References: <001201c28fd4$a5597fe0$0200000a@parseerror.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001201c28fd4$a5597fe0$0200000a@parseerror.dk>; from mb@ncparty.dk on Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:04:52PM +0100 List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Matias_Bj=F8rling?= Cc: linux-smp@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 03:04:52PM +0100, Matias Bj=F8rling wrote: > ACPI: Searched entire block, no RSDP was found. > What's RSDP? A pointer to ACPI tables. It can reside in multiple places. The first attempt failed but... > ACPI: RSDP located at physical address c00f6700 > RSD PTR v0 [PTLTD ] This one succeeded, so no problem here. > CPU 0 (0x0000) enabledProcessor #0 Unknown CPU [15:2] APIC version 1= 6 >=20 > LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0001] id[0x6] enabled[1]) > CPU 1 (0x0600) enabledProcessor #6 Unknown CPU [15:2] APIC version 1= 6 >=20 > LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0002] id[0x1] enabled[1]) > CPU 2 (0x0100) enabledProcessor #1 Unknown CPU [15:2] APIC version 1= 6 >=20 > LAPIC (acpi_id[0x0003] id[0x7] enabled[1]) > CPU 3 (0x0700) enabledProcessor #7 Unknown CPU [15:2] APIC version 1= 6 >=20 > ** Why does it say unknown, It's Xeon P4 2.4ghz ( and why does it fi= rst find > the correct name later ) This is the APIC ID->Name translation. .19 didn't have P4 Xeon in the list. Should be fixed in 2.4.20rc > WARNING: unexpected IO-APIC, please mail > to linux-smp@vger.kernel.org >=20 > ... What does this error mean? :D IO-APIC isn't in the whitelist in 2.4.19 This is ok, as it still gets used. .20rc1 should have this fixed. > ** What about hyperthreading?.. Is it already enabled? ( I enabled = it in > the bios ) Dosent the kernel want to say anything cool about it that= it use > it? besides 4 processors. And that's not 'cool' enough ? 8-) If there are only 2 physical CPUs there, then this is working fine. 2.4.20rc2 will also print nice things in /proc/cpuinfo for you. Dave --=20 | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs