Linux SNPS ARC Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: "compatible" and "model" properties in .dts for ARC boards
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:50:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1446749422.3151.29.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)

Hi Vineet,

During OpenWRT upsreaming process one interesting topic was raised.
See in the middle of https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2015-November/036959.html

In Device Tree descriptions for our boards we don't use "model" property
even though it is a required one as specified by ePAPR, see
http://free-electrons.com/~thomas/pub/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.0.pdf,
page 39 "Table 3-1 Root node properties".

Instead we put 2 items in "compatible" property.

For example:
------------------->8----------------
compatible = "snps,axs101", "snps,arc-sdp";
------------------->8----------------
here: http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arc/boot/dts/axs101.dts#n16

And from ePAPR standpoint it makes sense to split contents of that "compatible"
property in 2:
------------------->8----------------
compatible = "snps,arc-sdp";
model = "snps,axs101";
------------------->8----------------

But I do see problems with implementation of that thing.
Today we have a luxury of selection of AXS init functionality
based on that compatible value and if "snps,axs101" goes in
"model" then we'll need to add some more code in
arch/arc/plat-axs10x/axs10x.c that reads "model" value with
of_get_property() and then compare to "axs10{1|3}".

Any thoughts?

-Alexey

             reply	other threads:[~2015-11-05 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-05 18:50 Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2015-11-06  4:45 ` "compatible" and "model" properties in .dts for ARC boards Vineet Gupta
2015-11-06  8:59   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-06 10:57     ` Jonas Gorski
2015-11-17 12:18       ` Vineet Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1446749422.3151.29.camel@synopsys.com \
    --to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox