From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 00/17] ARC Dwarf unwinder improvements
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:10:58 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449146475-15335-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> (raw)
Hi guys,
In light of perf -g stalling (as unwinder was taking ~3million cycles for non
existent entries), I've revamped the dwarf unwinder.
There are some optim tweaks and much of it is "De-generalization" for things
which we can safely assume on ARC.
Crude Instrumentation shows following improvements per unwinder call:
- Avg time come down from ~4650 cycles to ~2794 cycles (+40%)
- Max time come down 9793 cycles to 5987 cycles
This is on a SMP FPGA config @ 75 MHz
It seems much of time (65%) is taken for binary lookup thru ~12k FDE entries,
roughly 13 lookups, each likely a dcache miss.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vgupta/arc # topic-unwinder-rework-4-instrument
-Vineet
Vineet Gupta (17):
ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide generation of const propagated clones
ARC: dw2 unwind: remove unused cruft
ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove handling of for signal frame
ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove FP based unwinding
ARC: dw2 unwind: Better printing
ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify Main FDE Table size everytime
ARC: dw2 unwind: Refactor the FDE lookup table (eh_frame_header) code
ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify FDE lookup table metadata
ARC: dw2 unwind: Use striaght forward code to implement binary lookup
ARC: dw2 unwind: CIE parsing/validation done only once at startup
ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide REG_INVALID check
ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide a loop if DW_CFA_register not present
ARC: dw2 unwind: Assume all regs to be unsigned long
ARC: dw2 unwind: No need for __get_user
ARC: dw2 unwind: Single exit point for instrumentation
ARC: dw2 unwind: skip regs not updated
xxx: instrument
arch/arc/include/asm/unwind.h | 47 +--
arch/arc/kernel/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c | 806 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------
3 files changed, 313 insertions(+), 541 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 12:40 Vineet Gupta [this message]
2015-12-03 12:40 ` [PATCH 01/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide generation of const propagated clones Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 02/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: remove unused cruft Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 03/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove handling of for signal frame Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 04/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove FP based unwinding Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 05/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Better printing Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 06/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify Main FDE Table size everytime Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 07/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Refactor the FDE lookup table (eh_frame_header) code Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify FDE lookup table metadata Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 09/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Use striaght forward code to implement binary lookup Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 10/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: CIE parsing/validation done only once at startup Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 11/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide REG_INVALID check Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 12/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide a loop if DW_CFA_register not present Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 13/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Assume all regs to be unsigned long Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 14/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: No need for __get_user Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 15/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Single exit point for instrumentation Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 16/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: skip regs not updated Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 17/17] xxx: instrument Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449146475-15335-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).