From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide a loop if DW_CFA_register not present
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 18:11:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449146475-15335-13-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449146475-15335-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com>
---
arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
index b1a520afcbcb..6eb377c102c6 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/unwind.c
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
uleb128_t reg, offs;
} cfa;
struct unwind_item regs[ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info)];
- unsigned stackDepth;
+ unsigned stackDepth:8, has_cfa_register:8;
const u8 *label;
const u8 *stack[MAX_STACK_DEPTH];
};
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ static int processCFI(const u8 *start, const u8 *end, unsigned long targetLoc,
case DW_CFA_register:
str = "cfa_register: ";
value = get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end);
+ state->has_cfa_register = 1;
set_rule(value, Register, get_uleb128(&ptr.p8, end), state, str);
break;
case DW_CFA_remember_state:
@@ -1010,11 +1011,18 @@ int arc_unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *frame)
unw_debug("\nCFA reg: r%ld, off: %ld => [SP] 0x%lx\n",
state.cfa.reg, state.cfa.offs, cfa);
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(state.regs); ++i) {
- switch (state.regs[i].where) {
- default:
- break;
- case Register:
+ /*
+ * For DW_CFA_register instruction, save registers initial state
+ * Note that a seperate pass is needed (vs. doing this in main loop below)
+ * to capture state of those regs at time of entry into function since
+ * the main loop below can possibly clobber them due to CFA ops of
+ * function being processed
+ *
+ * Since ARC gcc doesn't seem to generate those (ABI thing ?) try to
+ * optimize out the loop
+ */
+ for (i = 0; state.has_cfa_register && i < ARRAY_SIZE(state.regs); ++i) {
+ if (state.regs[i].where == Register) {
if (state.regs[i].value >= ARRAY_SIZE(reg_info))
return -EIO;
switch (reg_info[state.regs[i].value].width) {
@@ -1039,7 +1047,6 @@ int arc_unwind(struct unwind_frame_info *frame)
default:
return -EIO;
}
- break;
}
}
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 12:40 [RFC 00/17] ARC Dwarf unwinder improvements Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:40 ` [PATCH 01/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide generation of const propagated clones Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 02/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: remove unused cruft Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 03/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove handling of for signal frame Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 04/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Remove FP based unwinding Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 05/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Better printing Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 06/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify Main FDE Table size everytime Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 07/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Refactor the FDE lookup table (eh_frame_header) code Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Don't verify FDE lookup table metadata Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 09/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Use striaght forward code to implement binary lookup Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 10/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: CIE parsing/validation done only once at startup Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 11/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Elide REG_INVALID check Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 13/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Assume all regs to be unsigned long Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 14/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: No need for __get_user Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 15/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: Single exit point for instrumentation Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 16/17] ARC: dw2 unwind: skip regs not updated Vineet Gupta
2015-12-03 12:41 ` [PATCH 17/17] xxx: instrument Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449146475-15335-13-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).