From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] ARC: [intc] opencode arc_request_percpu_irq
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 13:06:37 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454052999-5349-4-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454052999-5349-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
- With only 1 caller, simply opencode it.
- The idea however is to remove the API usage since it has a subltle
design flaw - relies on being called on cpu0 first. This is true for
some early per cpu irqs such as TIMER/IPI, but not for late probed
per cpu peripherals such a perf. And it's usage in perf has already
bitten us once: see c6317bc7c5ab
("ARCv2: perf: Ensure perf intr gets enabled on all cores") where we
ended up open coding it anyways
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com>
---
arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h | 3 ---
arch/arc/kernel/irq.c | 29 -----------------------------
arch/arc/kernel/smp.c | 11 ++++++++++-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h
index c9b4d83c70f7..de33e83eb24d 100644
--- a/arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -20,8 +20,5 @@
#include <asm-generic/irq.h>
extern void arc_init_IRQ(void);
-void arc_request_percpu_irq(int irq, int cpu,
- irqreturn_t (*isr)(int irq, void *dev),
- const char *irq_nm, void *percpu_dev);
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arc/kernel/irq.c
index 88074b50456b..fb6dede9d05f 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/irq.c
@@ -50,32 +50,3 @@ void arch_do_IRQ(unsigned int irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
irq_exit();
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
}
-
-/*
- * API called for requesting percpu interrupts - called by each CPU
- * - For boot CPU, actually request the IRQ with genirq core + enables
- * - For subsequent callers only enable called locally
- *
- * Relies on being called by boot cpu first (i.e. request called ahead) of
- * any enable as expected by genirq. Hence Suitable only for TIMER, IPI
- * which are guaranteed to be setup on boot core first.
- * Late probed peripherals such as perf can't use this as there no guarantee
- * of being called on boot CPU first.
- */
-
-void arc_request_percpu_irq(int irq, int cpu,
- irqreturn_t (*isr)(int irq, void *dev),
- const char *irq_nm,
- void *percpu_dev)
-{
- /* Boot cpu calls request, all call enable */
- if (!cpu) {
- int rc;
-
- rc = request_percpu_irq(irq, isr, irq_nm, percpu_dev);
- if (rc)
- panic("Percpu IRQ request failed for %d\n", irq);
- }
-
- enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
-}
diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
index ea790f1c1107..0e71ad0a43c0 100644
--- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
@@ -354,7 +354,16 @@ int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, int irq)
{
int *dev = per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_dev, cpu);
- arc_request_percpu_irq(irq, cpu, do_IPI, "IPI Interrupt", dev);
+ /* Boot cpu calls request, all call enable */
+ if (!cpu) {
+ int rc;
+
+ rc = request_percpu_irq(irq, do_IPI, "IPI Interrupt", dev);
+ if (rc)
+ panic("Percpu IRQ request failed for %d\n", irq);
+ }
+
+ enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
return 0;
}
--
2.5.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-29 7:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-29 7:36 [PATCH 0/5] ARC IRQ setup changes Vineet Gupta
2016-01-29 7:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARC: [intc-compact] Remove IPI setup from ARCompact port Vineet Gupta
2016-01-29 7:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARC: [intc-compact] setup TIMER as percpu_dev Vineet Gupta
2016-01-29 7:36 ` Vineet Gupta [this message]
2016-01-29 7:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARC: [intc-*] Do a domain lookup in primary handler for hwirq -> linux virq Vineet Gupta
2016-01-29 7:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARC: [intc-*] switch to linear domain Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454052999-5349-4-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com \
--to=vineet.gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).