Patches for ARC

Patches for ARC

[Alexey Brodkin]

Hi Waldemar,

Just saw that new change for ARC ("arc: use generic lowlevellock",
http://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=1b49dc96d103e0151fee290d55cea55aa12c906d).

Even though this is very nice to see fixes and improvements done by people
outside Synopsys IMHO it still makes sense to add SNPS people in the loop so
we may review submitted patches.

So could you please first get an Ack from either Vineet (in Cc) or me before
committing stuff for ARC? Alternatively just Cc?linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org.

Again I'm very happy with uClibc-ng and appreciate a lot all your efforts
and to make uClibc-ng more robust let's review stuff together.

Also it was hard for me to find a relevant patch on the mailing list
because I was expecting patch to be sent via git "send-email" (which I think
should be a standard way for patch submissions in uClibc). Only going through a relevant
thread for ARM I found a message with attached files.

-Alexey

Patches for ARC

[Waldemar Brodkorb]

Hi Alexey,
Alexey Brodkin wrote,

> Hi Waldemar,
> 
> Just saw that new change for ARC ("arc: use generic lowlevellock",
> http://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=1b49dc96d103e0151fee290d55cea55aa12c906d).
> 
> Even though this is very nice to see fixes and improvements done by people
> outside Synopsys IMHO it still makes sense to add SNPS people in the loop so
> we may review submitted patches.

You are right, I first thought I need to add you, then I thought you
are reading the low traffic list anyway. 
Sorry for the trouble.
 
> So could you please first get an Ack from either Vineet (in Cc) or me before
> committing stuff for ARC? Alternatively just Cc?linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org.

I will do in the future. Do you thing following patch would be okay
to commit to make changes to architecture specific parts
more formal?
 
> Again I'm very happy with uClibc-ng and appreciate a lot all your efforts
> and to make uClibc-ng more robust let's review stuff together.
> 
> Also it was hard for me to find a relevant patch on the mailing list
> because I was expecting patch to be sent via git "send-email" (which I think
> should be a standard way for patch submissions in uClibc). Only going through a relevant
> thread for ARM I found a message with attached files.

Is the commit okay or do I need to revert it?

@Max: Okay to add you as Xtensa maintainer?

best regards
 Waldemar
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-add-MAINTAINERS-information.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 791 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/attachments/20160613/1786218c/attachment.bin>

Patches for ARC

[Max Filippov]

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016@11:38 PM, Waldemar Brodkorb <wbx@uclibc-ng.org> wrote:
> @Max: Okay to add you as Xtensa maintainer?

Sure, thanks.

-- Max

Patches for ARC

[Alexey Brodkin]

Hi Waldemar,

On Mon, 2016-06-13@22:38 +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
> Alexey Brodkin wrote,
> 
> > 
> > Hi Waldemar,
> > 
> > Just saw that new change for ARC ("arc: use generic lowlevellock",
> > http://cgit.uclibc-ng.org/cgi/cgit/uclibc-ng.git/commit/?id=1b49dc96d103e0151fee290d55cea55aa12c906d).
> > 
> > Even though this is very nice to see fixes and improvements done by people
> > outside Synopsys IMHO it still makes sense to add SNPS people in the loop so
> > we may review submitted patches.
> You are right, I first thought I need to add you, then I thought you
> are reading the low traffic list anyway.?
> Sorry for the trouble.
> ?
> > 
> > So could you please first get an Ack from either Vineet (in Cc) or me before
> > committing stuff for ARC? Alternatively just Cc?linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org.
> I will do in the future. Do you thing following patch would be okay
> to commit to make changes to architecture specific parts
> more formal?
> ?
> > 
> > Again I'm very happy with uClibc-ng and appreciate a lot all your efforts
> > and to make uClibc-ng more robust let's review stuff together.
> > 
> > Also it was hard for me to find a relevant patch on the mailing list
> > because I was expecting patch to be sent via git "send-email" (which I think
> > should be a standard way for patch submissions in uClibc). Only going through a relevant
> > thread for ARM I found a message with attached files.
> Is the commit okay or do I need to revert it?

Sorry for late reply.

Yep this commit is fine so no need to do anything here.

-Alexey