From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ath9k-htc on OHCI -> bogus usb xfer
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 09:30:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467797356.3086.48.camel@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577CCAB8.90003@de.bosch.com>
Hi?Oleksij,
On Wed, 2016-07-06@11:09 +0200, fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel wrote:
>
> On 06.07.2016 10:45, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> >
> > Hi Oleksij,
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-07-06@10:38 +0200, fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06.07.2016 10:32, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Oleksij,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2016-07-06@10:24 +0200, fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ?
> > > > > Hm... this Endpoint should be Interrupt, not Bulk. If you search for
> > > > > lsusb of this kind of adapter all of them list EP3 and EP4 as Interrupt.
> > > > >
> > > > > what did went wrong here? Is it not working in USB High Speed mode?
> > > > Unfortunately as of now on that board EHCI doesn't work.
> > > >
> > > > That's not a problem of a particular USB device but something in either
> > > > ECHI host controller or its integration. I do hope we will fix it sometime soon
> > > > (this is a development board and USB controller is implemented in FPGA so
> > > > there's a chance to fix stuff later on).
> > > >
> > > > So given only OHCI works on the board I went forward and attempted to use it
> > > > with Wi-Fi USB dongle.
> > > I did some tests for 2 years on OHCI controller on x86. There was no
> > > noticable issues. It was even a bit faster then Intels EHCI. I don't
> > > think OHCI alone is the source of this problem.
> > Well I was also surprised how well that dongle works with that board in
> > OHCI mode. I saw quite consistent ~4-5 Mbit/second rates when doing Speedtest
> > from my smartphone. So IMHO it's completely usable. Especially on that kind of
> > HW which has main CPU running at just 100MHz.
> >
> > >
> > > On other side, so far i know, this adapter claims to provide usb full
> > > speed support, (Not only high speed) and may use different usb
> > > descriptor for this. May be this is the problem.
> > So is there something we may do with all that?
> Sure...
>
> This shows that EP4 is Bluk in full speed mode. And it is defined by a
> boot loader of this chip:
> grep -R USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE *
> sboot/magpie_1_1/sboot/hif/usb/src/usb_table.c:
> m2BYTE(USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE, USB_FS_EP4_MAX_PACKET_SIZE),
> sboot/magpie_1_1/sboot/hif/usb/src/usb_table.h:#define
> USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE????????????bUSB_EP_TYPE_BULK
> sboot/magpie_1_1/inc/usb_table.h:#define USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE
> ?bUSB_EP_TYPE_BULK
> target_firmware/magpie_fw_dev/target/inc/k2/usb_table.h:#define
> USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE????????????bUSB_EP_TYPE_BULK
> target_firmware/magpie_fw_dev/target/inc/magpie/usb_table.h:#define
> USB_FS_EP4_ATTRIBUTE????????????bUSB_EP_TYPE_BULK
>
>
> So, there are fallowing variants to fix it:
> a) patch full speed usb descriptor in firmware and add usb reinit
> support to the driver.
> b) add support of different EP4 types.
>
> In any case, some one need to implement it... right now i have time only
> for mentoring.
That's understood.
> It is hard to say, which solution is better. It will affect performance
> and stability. We will need lots of testing on different HW variants to
> know it.
> May be usb maeling list can give some input here?
Let's hope so :)
> Currently we have fallowing issues:
> - if EP4 and EP3 are Interrupt, it works slower on High Speed controller.
> - if EP4 and EP3 are Bulk, the work better on High Speed and brake on
> Super Speed controllers. This adapter support my 64B packets and if we
> have more, fifo of this adapter will overrun.
> - Full Speed is currently unknown field for me, and it looks like it was
> never actually working properly.
But given that dongle seem to work fine with muted warning do you think it's
fine to continue that way or not?
I mean if there's a chance this "bogus usb xfer" might affect something during
execution? Otherwise if that's just not a crucial problem or not a problem at all
may be we may just think how to make this warning not so annoying (in my case
I saw never ending flood of those warnings so that basically stopped me from using
the board after that warning started to appear.
-Alexey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-05 12:20 ath9k-htc on OHCI -> bogus usb xfer Alexey Brodkin
2016-07-05 17:23 ` Oleksij Rempel
2016-07-05 17:31 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-07-05 19:01 ` Oleksij Rempel
2016-07-06 7:44 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-07-06 8:24 ` fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel
2016-07-06 8:32 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-07-06 8:38 ` fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel
2016-07-06 8:45 ` Alexey Brodkin
2016-07-06 9:09 ` fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel
2016-07-06 9:30 ` Alexey Brodkin [this message]
2016-07-06 10:32 ` fixed-term.Oleksij.Rempel
2016-07-07 5:16 ` Alexey Brodkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467797356.3086.48.camel@synopsys.com \
--to=alexey.brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).