From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 15:55:02 +0000 Subject: tst-atomic In-Reply-To: <20180313195515.GK2114@waldemar-brodkorb.de> References: <1520952717.4993.18.camel@synopsys.com> <20180313195515.GK2114@waldemar-brodkorb.de> List-ID: Message-ID: <1522857302.4851.53.camel@synopsys.com> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org Hi Waldemar, On Tue, 2018-03-13@20:55 +0100, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > Hi Alexey, > Alexey Brodkin wrote, > > > Hi Waldemar, > > > > I see in commit e65912f8b2a6 ("rework most tests to work as standalone package") > > "tst-atomic" and "tst-atomic-long" were marked as disabled for all architectures > > as opposed to previously (in times of test-suite being a part of uClibc) disabled > > only for selected arches (IA64, MIPS and SPARC). > > > > The only guess I have it was done due to inability to refer not-exported "atomic.h". > > Is that correct? But anyways I'm looking at a possibility to revive those as they > > might be of use especially in case of emulation of atomics. > > > > Any thoughts on how that could be done? > > Should we export atomic.h again? > The header is removed since > 536a0e3a05a0c7d9a4d741d9401c220900cf1e04. Probably not as this will open again a can with worms. Fortunately I was able to get my problem understood and almost solved, I guess you're on Cc list of that discussion here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-snps-arc/2018-March/003583.html But then why don't we get rid of ./test/silly/tst-atomic*.c at all? -Alexey