From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:50:32 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 9/9] clocksource: import ARC timer driver In-Reply-To: References: <35bde193-8492-83e0-fb03-8385d8afd007@synopsys.com> <1477954096-770-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1477954096-770-10-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <20161101204257.GG1506@mai> <188a2912-3369-19a3-86af-cbb154ff7e44@synopsys.com> <20161102001925.GH1506@mai> <2dcf87ce-a278-8ef8-3c8e-3cf7124603c9@synopsys.com> List-ID: Message-ID: <20161103165032.GA1859@mai> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016@09:40:23AM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/01/2016 06:03 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >>> Because of the git mv you, diff didn't include bulk of driver code which would > >>> >> make for bulk of review anyways. So perhaps in v2 I don't do the git mv. OK ? > >> > > >> > That means I will review and comment existing code. It is not a problem for me > >> > if you agree to do the changes. > > Sure, the whole point is to make things better as an outcome of review. I have no > > issues changing code provided we don't add major performance regressions. > > So just wondering if I could have some comments on the initial import of driver > before I send out a v2. Yeah, ok. Let me comment the other patches of the series and then you can send a V2. > The issue is git mv didn't show bulk of code being moved. Shall I send a v2 with a > different ordering so I introduce the driver first, with new headers, new Kconfig > items etc and then as a subsequent patch prune those bits from arch/arc/* ? > > -Vineet