From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano) Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:46:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm In-Reply-To: <4ca3d740-dd75-fb4b-1967-aa3a605af62d@synopsys.com> References: <1478208701-30923-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1478208701-30923-2-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <20161103215221.GM1859@mai> <952c1d98-2827-5127-2440-edab342e6b77@synopsys.com> <20161103223523.GB15759@mai> <4ca3d740-dd75-fb4b-1967-aa3a605af62d@synopsys.com> List-ID: Message-ID: <20161103224650.GE15759@mai> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 03, 2016@03:44:24PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/03/2016 03:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016@03:23:09PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> On 11/03/2016 02:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016@02:31:32PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >>>> The current code doesn't even compile .... > >>> > >>> Give a better description in the log, especially if this patch is supposed to > >>> go to stable@ > >> > >> OK. > > > > [ ... ] > > Here's what I added > > ----> > ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm > > The current code doesn't even compile as somehow the inline assembly > can't see the register names defined as ARC_RTC_* > I'm pretty sure It worked when I first got it merged, but the tools were > definitely different then. > > So better to write this in "C" anyways. Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano