From: daniel@ffwll.ch (Daniel Vetter)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: DRM_UDL and GPU under Xserver
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 11:17:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180409091706.GU31310@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523264135.5268.14.camel@synopsys.com>
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018@08:55:36AM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Mon, 2018-04-09@10:31 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018@06:39:41PM +0000, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > Hi Daniel, all,
>
> [snip]
>
> > > Ok it was quite some time ago so I forgot about that completely.
> > > I really made one trivial change in xf86-video-armada:
> > > ------------------------>8--------------------------
> > > --- a/src/armada_module.c
> > > +++ b/src/armada_module.c
> > > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > > #define ARMADA_NAME "armada"
> > > #define ARMADA_DRIVER_NAME "armada"
> > >
> > > -#define DRM_MODULE_NAMES "armada-drm", "imx-drm"
> > > +#define DRM_MODULE_NAMES "armada-drm", "imx-drm", "udl"
> > > #define DRM_DEFAULT_BUS_ID NULL
> > > ------------------------>8--------------------------
> > >
> > > Otherwise Xserver fails on start which is expected given "imx-drm" is intentionally removed.
>
> Here I meant I explicitly disabled DRM_IMX in the kernel configuraion
> so that it is not used in run-time.
>
> > You need to keep imx-drm around. And then light up the udl display using
> > prime. Afaiui it should all just work (but with maybe a few disconnected
> > outputs from imx-drm around that you don't need, but that's not a
> > problem).
>
> And given my comment above I don't really see any difference between
> DRM_IMX and DRM_UDL (except their HW implmentation which I guess should
> not bother upper layers) so why do wee need to treat them differently?
>
> Most probably I'm missing something but my thought was if we have
> 2 equally well supported KMS devices we may easily swap them and still
> have resulting setup functional.
armada is not a generic drm driver, but can only be used for armada-drm
and imx-drm. You can't just use it with any drm device, for that you need
a generic driver like -modesetting.
Just enable all the drivers you have for your hw, and it should work.
Hacking on drivers without knowing what they expect tends to not work so
well.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-09 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-04 20:06 DRM_UDL and GPU under Xserver Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-05 6:18 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-05 7:16 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-05 9:32 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-05 10:10 ` Jose Abreu
2018-04-05 10:29 ` Lucas Stach
2018-04-05 10:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-05 11:10 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-05 13:44 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-05 18:39 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-09 8:31 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-04-09 8:55 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-09 9:17 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-04-09 9:45 ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-04-13 15:52 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180409091706.GU31310@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox