From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sashal@kernel.org (Sasha Levin)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:45:26 -0400
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 111/167] signal/arc: Use force_sig_fault
 where appropriate
In-Reply-To: <87ef0xqq9f.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
References: <20190903162519.7136-1-sashal@kernel.org>
 <20190903162519.7136-111-sashal@kernel.org>
 <87ef0xqq9f.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
List-ID: <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Message-ID: <20190903194526.GH5281@sasha-vm>
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019@11:49:16AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>Sasha Levin <sashal at kernel.org> writes:
>
>> From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm at xmission.com>
>>
>> [ Upstream commit 15773ae938d8d93d982461990bebad6e1d7a1830 ]
>
>To the best of my knowledge this is just a clean up, no changes in
>behavior are present.
>
>The only reason I can see to backport this is so that later fixes could
>be applied cleanly.
>
>So while I have no objections to this patch being backported I don't see
>why you would want to either.

This patch along with the next one came in as a dependency for
a8c715b4dd73c ("ARC: mm: SIGSEGV userspace trying to access kernel
virtual memory").

--
Thanks,
Sasha