From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: buildroot@busybox.net, Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com,
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] toolchain/ARC: Enable ability to build with upstream gcc/binutils
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 22:26:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191206222612.6006c8ae@windsurf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191206193924.18777-4-vgupta@synopsys.com>
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 11:39:24 -0800
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com> wrote:
> While ARC upstream gcc/binutils work, they are still trailing behind
> the more up to date code at github. To help expedite this gap, we want
> to test the upstreeam versiosn more often, hence this patch. It allows
> ARC tools to be built of upstream gcc/binutils.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> ---
> arch/Config.in.arc | 4 ++++
> package/binutils/Config.in.host | 6 +++---
> package/binutils/binutils.mk | 2 +-
> package/gcc/Config.in.host | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/Config.in.arc b/arch/Config.in.arc
> index fdfafda31c72..c389ba8b42c9 100644
> --- a/arch/Config.in.arc
> +++ b/arch/Config.in.arc
> @@ -59,6 +59,10 @@ config BR2_arc
> bool
> default y if BR2_arcle || BR2_arceb
>
> +config BR2_arc_gh
> + bool "ARC github tools"
> + default y if BR2_arc
That's not how we want to handle this.
> +
> config BR2_ENDIAN
> default "LITTLE" if BR2_arcle
> default "BIG" if BR2_arceb
> diff --git a/package/binutils/Config.in.host b/package/binutils/Config.in.host
> index 514f620086eb..78785878cecc 100644
> --- a/package/binutils/Config.in.host
> +++ b/package/binutils/Config.in.host
> @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ config BR2_PACKAGE_HOST_BINUTILS_SUPPORTS_CFI
>
> choice
> prompt "Binutils Version"
> - default BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_32_X if !BR2_arc && !BR2_csky
> - default BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_ARC if BR2_arc
> + default BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_32_X if !BR2_arc_gh && !BR2_csky
> + default BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_ARC if BR2_arc_gh
> default BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_CSKY if BR2_csky
> help
> Select the version of binutils you wish to use.
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_33_X
>
> config BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_ARC
> bool "binutils arc (2.31)"
> - depends on BR2_arc
> + depends on BR2_arc_gh
For binutils, you can already select any upstream version, or the ARC
specific version on ARC. So there is nothing to change here: you can
already select either upstream or ARC-specific.
> diff --git a/package/gcc/Config.in.host b/package/gcc/Config.in.host
> index 92af40b19fc3..d9f4c6cae14b 100644
> --- a/package/gcc/Config.in.host
> +++ b/package/gcc/Config.in.host
> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ comment "GCC Options"
Ditto for gcc, you can already chose any upstream gcc version >= 7.x
for ARC, or the ARC-specific version.
So, I don't understand what your patch brings: what you describe in
your commit log is already possible today.
The following defconfig is already possible with Buildroot today:
BR2_arcle=y
BR2_archs38=y
BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_GLIBC=y
BR2_BINUTILS_VERSION_2_33_X=y
BR2_GCC_VERSION_9_X=y
It builds an ARC HS38 glibc toolchain with upstream gcc 9.x and
upstream binutils 2.33.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
_______________________________________________
linux-snps-arc mailing list
linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-06 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-06 19:39 [PATCH 0/3] ARC toolchian related fixes Vineet Gupta
2019-12-06 19:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] toolchain,glibc: Allow ARC big endian glibc builds Vineet Gupta
2019-12-06 21:18 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] toolchain, glibc: " Thomas Petazzoni
2019-12-06 19:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] binutils/ARC: move ARC specific code together Vineet Gupta
2019-12-06 21:19 ` [Buildroot] " Thomas Petazzoni
2019-12-17 21:32 ` [PATCH v2] binutils/ARC: cleanup Vineet Gupta
2019-12-22 21:41 ` [Buildroot] " Thomas Petazzoni
2020-01-13 17:48 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-09-10 23:21 ` Vineet Gupta
2020-09-11 9:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2020-09-11 19:37 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-12-06 19:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] toolchain/ARC: Enable ability to build with upstream gcc/binutils Vineet Gupta
2019-12-06 21:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191206222612.6006c8ae@windsurf.home \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=Evgeniy.Didin@synopsys.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox