From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C57C2D0A8 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE212076E for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ZtJpt1GL"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="pNi62cLp" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EFE212076E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=WUswNjeUy22hOw9F1hnepfxUVaQbAYessKfDoflVeP8=; b=ZtJpt1GLc6hw/G1EyBU0hotxq ZsdesFQrZVHITpIfR5zjRPlwnyV2nswStg9SvNmtYeAeoyxw1D69qBhWR3rqmwJQsi8uNG3t2NK3y WtdUUXO97yMj0G9YAwR5+poslqBFdKnSthq2TrCW5Wqxr+GCvF19FNB6gf6siv+d0alJTXl3RsYES typQZDYUB8CQEbuiz8M/qpXpjNt7H0hxAQ0ZedMXRUQWFfxC4ljllcKgXZfOJXA/mFo7znS6yCa5g Do+vPK9MOJd6oy/XJdwe/87i4MON7QMfQg5+CDpTswOdYOSnMHkgwwvnzDpQsureMZBP8G0QOs72s AOYYQvwJA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kL1sh-0004YK-AU; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:20:11 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kL1se-0004Xg-Nb; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:20:08 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=O4A3QRP4HEH7pkY19EFh0K5o5RX6GGVTm9jhhlkiNIA=; b=pNi62cLpz5Zta9gkWwEt4lfxLS MvhJOB6wShDmzS61MUaHO4PpqjGN9Sm/CRsoDDzFeOKdB1AsXqzPU0+ObaxataHs7GirJ6ZZrNA29 JPWLW2cWAsjQWQbdxWBW0dcBjYBOhFdcukcR730OctenEgtMdnxXFf2H16Xmyh8kGL1vudzudnTWS vgNOihiXykvGZ4JuqnJtzxEEw21LcbXj/0WRtpi2vf37zyqZKGgA0xHxtS+lCluMZDHojS7jgks+j aId3Dnzk0AyXRqRRmekuY3B5xhsSuZTtpZucjls9NPVPsQXWrpdBaC7TpOBBrZeOKsQtIyaebVCjb X6rPNsiw==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kL1sU-00033a-DF; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:19:58 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA94301124; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:19:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E35462B79EDA9; Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:19:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 12:19:53 +0200 From: peterz@infradead.org To: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch RFC 00/15] mm/highmem: Provide a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends Message-ID: <20200923101953.GT2674@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20200919091751.011116649@linutronix.de> <87mu1lc5mp.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87k0wode9a.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87eemwcpnq.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87a6xjd1dw.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> <87sgbbaq0y.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sgbbaq0y.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Juri Lelli , David Airlie , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Joonas Lahtinen , dri-devel , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Ben Segall , Max Filippov , Guo Ren , linux-sparc , Vincent Chen , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-arch , Vincent Guittot , Herbert Xu , Michael Ellerman , the arch/x86 maintainers , Russell King , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Mel Gorman , "open list:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE" , linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, Paul McKenney , intel-gfx , linuxppc-dev , Steven Rostedt , Jani Nikula , Rodrigo Vivi , Dietmar Eggemann , Linux ARM , Chris Zankel , Michal Simek , Thomas Bogendoerfer , Nick Hu , Linux-MM , Linus Torvalds , LKML , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Vetter , Vineet Gupta , Paul Mackerras , Andrew Morton , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , "David S. Miller" , Greentime Hu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 09:27:57PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Alternatively this could of course be solved with per CPU page tables > which will come around some day anyway I fear. Previously (with PTI) we looked at making the entire kernel map per-CPU, and that takes a 2K copy on switch_mm() (or more general, the user part of whatever the top level directory is for architectures that have a shared kernel/user page-table setup in the first place). The idea was having a fixed per-cpu kernel page-table, share a bunch of (kernel) page-tables between all CPUs and then copy in the user part on switch. I've forgotten what the plan was for ASID/PCID in that scheme. For x86_64 we've been fearing the performance of that 2k copy, but I don't think we've ever actually bit the bullet and implemented it to see how bad it really is. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc