From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C916AC54EBD for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:46:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=zFETfGpSD+pKbiu8NdXNlqRjKkWQPUJ4oNqIU3ePL8c=; b=yt+z+g4b7J6NJz fYmZQAhm9Q2dxlUIJ9h8MX5pqh47BSsmmxd7yUo0K0wJVpRRlJXovZHhbOi4uZOmwDwSfuwiAR1oY vsjw6RX3Y4HF+G8xOFIR5yfgfUDKZryz4VOSflpsjOHt2nLQiaG2SKqKUOLeFqs2UgIxR94QjONa3 ieijKiT88D3AXuhw7PvswOrZH9ZeuKtl5VxfzK5Q/PhaTO/cAY5bT6wsCoTOnpgRb2VT4gv11aaXo 6/V8abMZR3r+69J7+NGbf6oUwmQl272YHea90V3BWHThRd2ltDW6kIb+oj4aKqFU2zHcWKxYsKgxm B1yCXgl3/BIkb2oBhhGg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pF0uD-004XHZ-6A; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 22:46:13 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1pF0uA-004XGu-SM for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2023 22:46:12 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5858561447; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 520AAC433EF; Mon, 9 Jan 2023 22:46:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1673304368; bh=Smpr3DrhasTIUOdQUCkLW1n6OMxtHjQcAGkhZhSSagU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NrWnulaBpJswTJNHy51afCrsavlOnbtuYkpyeTJoDlBMYqgN/PeSkGKExpci/qM4d WbVIfcvQBMqAan8/zukuIIu+2yZRT6exWCBTwZTobsdkdh/s1Hh1WFo5VfhgHYzcQG 3eOWgRys64FEGm9Cl9Ky5N+bwLQTBYBZ7fNjiufo= Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 14:46:07 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Vineet Gupta , Dan Carpenter , linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bit_spinlock: Include Message-Id: <20230109144607.02edd319f9b5e25ee774f9a5@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <8b81101d59a31f4927016c17e49be96754a23380.1673204461.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> References: <8b81101d59a31f4927016c17e49be96754a23380.1673204461.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230109_144610_984187_B389B62A X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.36 ) X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 20:04:44 +0100 Christophe JAILLET wrote: > In an attempt to simplify some includes in , it > appeared, when compiling fs/ecryptfs/dentry.c, that > was relying on other includes to get the definition of cpu_relax(). > (see [1]) > > It broke on arc. > > Include in to fix the issue. > This will help remove some un-needed includes from . > > [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202301082130.LXMj5qkD-lkp@intel.com/ > > ... > > --- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h > +++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > #ifndef __LINUX_BIT_SPINLOCK_H > #define __LINUX_BIT_SPINLOCK_H > > +#include > #include > #include > #include linux/processor.h would be preferable, rather than diving straight into asm/? _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc