From: vbabka@suse.cz (Vlastimil Babka)
To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: slub: Ensure that slab_unlock() is atomic
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:32:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DEF08D.607@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457447457-25878-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com>
On 03/08/2016 03:30 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> We observed livelocks on ARC SMP setup when running hackbench with SLUB.
> This hardware configuration lacks atomic instructions (LLOCK/SCOND) thus
> kernel resorts to a central @smp_bitops_lock to protect any R-M-W ops
> suh as test_and_set_bit()
Sounds like this architecture should then redefine __clear_bit_unlock
and perhaps other non-atomic __X_bit() variants to be atomic, and not
defer this requirement to places that use the API?
> The spinlock itself is implemented using Atomic [EX]change instruction
> which is always available.
>
> The race happened when both cores tried to slab_lock() the same page.
>
> c1 c0
> ----------- -----------
> slab_lock
> slab_lock
> slab_unlock
> Not observing the unlock
>
> This in turn happened because slab_unlock() doesn't serialize properly
> (doesn't use atomic clear) with a concurrent running
> slab_lock()->test_and_set_bit()
>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl at linux.com>
> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg at kernel.org>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes at google.com>
> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim at lge.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm at linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Noam Camus <noamc at ezchip.com>
> Cc: <stable at vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <linux-mm at kvack.org>
> Cc: <linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: <linux-snps-arc at lists.infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta at synopsys.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index d8fbd4a6ed59..b7d345a508dc 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ static __always_inline void slab_lock(struct page *page)
> static __always_inline void slab_unlock(struct page *page)
> {
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageTail(page), page);
> - __bit_spin_unlock(PG_locked, &page->flags);
> + bit_spin_unlock(PG_locked, &page->flags);
> }
>
> static inline void set_page_slub_counters(struct page *page, unsigned long counters_new)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-08 14:30 [PATCH] mm: slub: Ensure that slab_unlock() is atomic Vineet Gupta
2016-03-08 15:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-03-08 15:46 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-08 20:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-03-09 6:43 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 10:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-09 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-09 11:12 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 11:00 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-09 11:53 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-14 8:05 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 13:22 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-09 14:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-10 5:51 ` Vineet Gupta
2016-03-10 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-08 15:32 ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56DEF08D.607@suse.cz \
--to=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).